Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

NaN and Infinity should fail type:number with option strictNumbers #1128

Closed
epoberezkin opened this issue Nov 28, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed

NaN and Infinity should fail type:number with option strictNumbers #1128

epoberezkin opened this issue Nov 28, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@epoberezkin
Copy link
Member

epoberezkin commented Nov 28, 2019 •
edited
Loading

What problem do you want to solve?

#182 (comment)

What do you think is the correct solution to problem?

Option changing type validation. Check if these values are coercible to strings - with this option coercion should fail too

Will you be able to implement it?

Maybe
issacgerges pushed a commit to issacgerges/ajv that referenced this issue May 22, 2020
Add option for strictNumbers. Resolves ajv-validator#1128.
577ff49
@issacgerges issacgerges mentioned this issue May 22, 2020
Merged
issacgerges pushed a commit to issacgerges/ajv that referenced this issue May 22, 2020
Add option for strictNumbers. Resolves ajv-validator#1128.
6727a79
issacgerges pushed a commit to issacgerges/ajv that referenced this issue May 27, 2020
Add option for strictNumbers. Resolves ajv-validator#1128.
3f25187
epoberezkin added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2020
@epoberezkin
Merge pull request #1219 from issacgerges/strict-numbers
f3cb494 
Add option for strictNumbers. Resolves #1128.
@dependabot dependabot bot mentioned this issue Mar 14, 2021
Merged
This was referenced Dec 14, 2021
Closed
Closed
@X-oss-byte X-oss-byte mentioned this issue Sep 7, 2024
Open
This was referenced Sep 8, 2024
Open
Open
Open
Open
This was referenced Sep 14, 2024
Open
Open
@X-oss-byte X-oss-byte mentioned this issue Sep 17, 2024
Open
This was referenced Sep 18, 2024
Open
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@epoberezkin