-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update TestScheduler.cs #5011
Merged
Merged
Update TestScheduler.cs #5011
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so this is compare-and-swap basically @brah-mcdude ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah ok, I think I get this now after reading the original issue on #5010
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tickItems is a queue of all the items that we want to schedule for a specific scheduledTime tick.
We need to extract this queue from the dictionary of all _scheduledWork.
If TryGetValue fails, then we need to create tickItems and add it to _scheduledWork.
However, if by the time that we call TryAdd, someone else has already added a new tickItems at the scheduledTime tick entry, our call to TryAdd will fail. In such a scenario - we need to start over.
In other words, we need to loop while TryGetValue fails.
Actually, our thread's SECOND attempt to TryAdd MUST ALWAYS succeed.
So, theoretically, we could re-write it as a 3 iterations for loop: (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) that will throw an exception if i reaches 2.