-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 121
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a certificate to an ELB that does not already have a listener added #13
Comments
While I like the concept, it requires quite a bit of extra configuration. In addition to the usual port, you need to know:
If we can come up with answers to these questions, I'm happy to add support for this. |
Good point, perhaps there should be a flag |
That might be the right solution. I've got some refactors I want to do this On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Michael Walsh notifications@github.com
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to |
Can you file a seperate issue with a full traceback on what happens if you On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:13 AM, bshih-ixxus notifications@github.com
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to |
I got the same error exactly, with the traceback as follows
Hope that I could use the --cert-only feature soon. |
+1 |
👍 how are people bootstrapping without this? I'm just getting |
@th: you can still create an ELB with an HTTPS listener and a dummy cert. Can be an expired old cert, or you copy a cert from an EC2 instance, anything. |
Probably not the use case you want to address but if the ELB only has one listener, for port 80 perhaps, the script would not do anything and actually returns an error:
ValueError: need more than 0 values to unpack
. It would be handy if the script could populate a vanilla ELB with a certificate and added the necessary listener.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: