Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Fix for 4 vulnerabilities #1865

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

aliscco
Copy link
Owner

@aliscco aliscco commented May 16, 2024

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • node_modules/@actions/artifact/node_modules/@actions/http-client/package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
high severity 661/1000
Why? Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Uncontrolled resource consumption
SNYK-JS-BRACES-6838727
Yes No Known Exploit
medium severity 631/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.2
Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
SNYK-JS-INFLIGHT-6095116
Yes Proof of Concept
high severity 661/1000
Why? Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
SNYK-JS-MICROMATCH-6838728
Yes No Known Exploit
high severity 589/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-UNSETVALUE-2400660
Yes No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: jest The new version differs by 250 commits.
  • 8f9b812 v28.0.0
  • f424551 feat: Jest 28 blog post (#12732)
  • c79f8d6 feat: roll v28 docs (#12733)
  • e9f6610 Remove `core.autocrlf` config on CI (#12731)
  • 9342a23 docs: add mention of expect breaking change to upgrade guide (#12730)
  • e1f2515 chore: add missing `throw`
  • 039f43e chore: combine all v27 docs into a single one (#12729)
  • 256c1af chore(website): add some admonitions to 25.x (#12565)
  • fc85b8f fix: replace hash routine md5 with sha256 (#12722)
  • c1a57cb chore(deps): bump isbinaryfile dependency to ^5.0.0 (#12726)
  • 9ebfe0a chorer: add note about babel config to upgrade guide (#12724)
  • 4ec4b98 chore: cache yarn deps on netlify (#12725)
  • 62afb83 chore: revert #12718 and simply do not bundle type declarations of `@ jest/globals` (#12721)
  • 4f1d199 Add Yarn dedupe CI check (#12717)
  • 7a8c9cf Lock source-map-support verion to 0.5.13 (#12720)
  • 811228d Support error logging before jest retry (#12201)
  • a28db24 chore: do not bundle type definitions for packages which have only one `.d.ts` file (#12718)
  • 49ee158 update dependency @ microsoft/api-extractor to 7.23.0 (#12716)
  • e72c52f feat(jest-runner): export `TestRunner` interface types and reexport types from other packages (#12715)
  • 3c6f14b feat(jest-resolve): expose `PackageFilter`, `PathFilter` and `PackageJSON` types (#12712)
  • a293b75 refactor(jest-transform): rename TransformerConfig (#12708)
  • 625e0bc show that setupFilesAfterEnv scripts can define beforeAll (#12702)
  • 0208815 feat(jest-resolve): expose `JestResolver`, `AsyncResolver` and `SyncResolver` types (#12707)
  • 75c7c40 docs: use admonitions in ExpectAPI.md (#12679)

See the full diff

Package name: ts-jest The new version differs by 169 commits.

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Uncontrolled resource consumption
🦉 Prototype Pollution

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants