Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Deprecate and then remove ZORDER/IDNEXT since from 4.3 we have a different mechanism for order #82

Open
cipriandinu opened this issue Jan 27, 2023 · 10 comments
Open

Deprecate and then remove ZORDER/IDNEXT since from 4.3 we have a different mechanism for order #82

cipriandinu opened this issue Jan 27, 2023 · 10 comments
Labels
6 voting
Milestone
v5.0

Comments

@cipriandinu
Copy link
Member

Starting from version 4.3 a better ordering/grouping mechanism was defined. Usage of ZORDER/IDNEXT as a parallel ordering option may lead to a lot of issues (define priority between two systems, etc.). I propose to deprecate this mechanism starting from 5.0
@cipriandinu cipriandinu added this to the v5.0 milestone Jan 27, 2023
cipriandinu added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 12, 2024
@cipriandinu
#82
7ea0e83 
Remove old IDNEXT mechanism for reading order: remove attribute IDNEXT from BlockType and adapt documentation for ReadingOrder element
@cipriandinu
Copy link
Member Author

In order to solve this issue a new branch was created (issue-82) from (version5.0) branch (generic one for 5.0 changes). Please check the changes and if you think it completely covers the topic, please vote with ACCEPT, else add you comments and modify schema if needed

@cipriandinu
Copy link
Member Author

ACCEPT

3 similar comments
@cneud
Copy link
Member

cneud commented Jan 16, 2024

ACCEPT

@ntra00
Copy link
Member

ntra00 commented Jan 16, 2024

ACCEPT

@hanyelsawy
Copy link
Member

ACCEPT

@rajubln
Copy link

rajubln commented Jan 17, 2024

Accept

2 similar comments
@jukervin
Copy link
Member

Accept

@callylaw
Copy link
Member

Accept

@splet
Copy link

splet commented Jan 18, 2024

ACCEPT

@JLoitzenbauer-CRKN
Copy link

Accept

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
6 voting
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v5.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
9 participants
@cneud @ntra00 @jukervin @splet @rajubln @hanyelsawy @callylaw @cipriandinu @JLoitzenbauer-CRKN