-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Per-rate scaling notification #133
Comments
I don't think that rate scalers are the main problem here. Rather, you have a very low sites-to-taxa ratio (<0.1), which means the signal in the MSA is insufficient to resolve most branches. Hence, the extensive and time-consuming ML search as implemented and in raxml-ng (or old RAxML) is pretty pointless on this dataset. We have discussed this topic multiple times on our RAxML google group, please search for keywords like "poor signal": https://groups.google.com/g/raxml/search?q=poor%20signal In short, your options are:
|
Many apologies for confusing matters by mentioning why I was disabling the rate scalers, but thanks for the tips anyway! The main purpose of the report was simply to highlight that I had turned the scalers off, but the software reports that they had been enabled regardless. This was a bit misleading, so I was concerned that it may be a bug. |
ok I see, thanks for reporting! I guess you are right and it's currently not possible to disable rate scalers for alignments with >2000 taxa. I will take care of this. |
…ce model_rate_scalers` is specified (#133)
ok this should be fixed now, you can disable automatic rate scalers with |
I'm trying to speed up raxml-ng by disabling the automatic per-rate scaling (it worked fine on old raxml which I think did not implement this feature?).
But with
--rate-scalers off --force
I get the following note:NOTE: Per-rate scalers were automatically enabled to prevent numerical issues on taxa-rich alignments.
NOTE: You can use --force switch to skip this check and fall back to per-site scalers.
I'm assuming that it was disabled, but can't be sure, given this message?
Also, is it essential to have to use
--force
when combined with--rate-scalers off
, as I would rather not if possible?Full log below.
Cheers!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: