Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

first working draft of implementation for #80 signal head #112

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 6, 2022

Conversation

nicolaskolbenschlag
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: nicolaskolbenschlag nicolas.kolbenschlag@googlemail.com

Signed-off-by: nicolaskolbenschlag <nicolas.kolbenschlag@googlemail.com>
@nicolaskolbenschlag nicolaskolbenschlag linked an issue Dec 2, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
14 tasks
@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Dec 2, 2022



Test summary

6 0 0 0


Run details

Project sosci-frontend
Status Passed
Commit b3e8636
Started Dec 2, 2022 7:29 AM
Ended Dec 2, 2022 7:30 AM
Duration 00:52 💡
OS Linux Ubuntu - 20.04
Browser Chrome 107

View run in Cypress Dashboard ➡️


This comment has been generated by cypress-bot as a result of this project's GitHub integration settings. You can manage this integration in this project's settings in the Cypress Dashboard

Copy link
Collaborator

@PhlppKrmr PhlppKrmr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good so far, make sure to include tests to fulfill DoD.

One concern I have (not really scope of this issue) is performance. The signal head is once again computed on the CPU (in JS), we should look into how/if we can outsource some stuff onto the GPU.

Copy link
Collaborator

@PhlppKrmr PhlppKrmr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can't retrospectively change from "Approve" to "Request changes" (afaik). This is only to indicate that tests are missing :)

@motschel123
Copy link
Collaborator

Can't retrospectively change from "Approve" to "Request changes" (afaik). This is only to indicate that tests are missing :)

As far as the changes only implement logic inside the plot, it is not quite possible to test for that in cypress, same applies for cursor feature.
E.g. in your feature for line thickness you only could test the presence of the switches and not the logic displaying the thick lines.

Copy link
Collaborator

@motschel123 motschel123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.
As far as tests go it not really possible to test for plot only logic right now.

@nicolaskolbenschlag nicolaskolbenschlag merged commit 4e3be0b into dev Dec 6, 2022
@jandegen jandegen mentioned this pull request Dec 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Signal head
4 participants