Allow setting headers

[adamsanderson]

Addresses #3 by allowing users to set options.headers in connectRequest.

[ryanashcraft]

This looks great! Thanks for adding a test and update the README. Seems npm run lint is complaining, though.

I'm currently on vacation so I will have to take another look when I get back.

[adamsanderson]

Oh OK, I didn't notice you had that set up. I'll run it and fix whatever needs fixing. Enjoy your vacation, and stop checking github ;)

…

On Feb 17, 2017 9:14 AM, "Ryan Ashcraft" ***@***.***> wrote: This looks great! Thanks for adding a test and update the README. Seems npm run lint is complaining, though. I'm currently on vacation so I will have to take another look when I get back. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#10 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAkzRtIt0sM5snm5CqMKVuTLVlV43Ytks5rddWOgaJpZM4MD5OR> .

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #10 into master will increase coverage by 0.22%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #10      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.34%   88.57%   +0.22%     
==========================================
  Files           7        7              
  Lines         206      210       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits          182      186       +4     
  Misses         24       24

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/middleware/query.js	88.8% <100%> (+0.34%)	✅

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0d11bf2...f6cefd7. Read the comment docs.

[ryanashcraft]

@adamsanderson Can you modify the MUTATE_ASYNC case in the query middleware to set the headers for mutations? And it'd be great if you could add an accompanying test for mutations in query.tests.js. Thanks!

[adamsanderson]

Sure, no problem. For one reason or another I assumed that the both the mutations and the query branches shared the same request configuration code and didn't look closely enough. This should do the trick.

[ryanashcraft]

@adamsanderson Thanks for this change!