Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

integration test for name resolution shadowing #84

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 9, 2024

Conversation

tardyp
Copy link
Contributor

@tardyp tardyp commented Aug 26, 2024

Fix: #82

The actual fix is actually in prost-reflect, MR coming soon

@andrewhickman
Copy link
Owner

I've published prost-reflect version 0.14.1 which will hopefully make this test pass 🤞

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.63%. Comparing base (cc3712e) to head (68d80f4).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #84      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.67%   92.63%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          19       19              
  Lines        2430     2430              
==========================================
- Hits         2252     2251       -1     
- Misses        178      179       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@andrewhickman andrewhickman merged commit 4bf37a7 into andrewhickman:main Sep 9, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

package resolution of protox is less strict than protoc
3 participants