Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: run travis with Node LTS version #2786

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2017

Conversation

devversion
Copy link
Member

  • Switches Travis CI to the NodeJS LTS release. 6.9.4.
  • Changes the package.json name for the sources to be similar as in angular/angular.

* Switches Travis CI to the NodeJS LTS release. `6.9.4`.
* Changes the package.json name for the sources to be similar as in `angular/angular`.
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Jan 24, 2017
Copy link
Member

@jelbourn jelbourn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jelbourn jelbourn added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker and removed pr: needs review labels Jan 24, 2017
@andrewseguin andrewseguin merged commit 55b9224 into angular:master Jan 24, 2017
@devversion devversion deleted the chore/switch-to-lts-node branch January 25, 2017 16:09
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 6, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants