generated from ansible-collections/collection_template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 140
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sanity checks is failed for the devel and milestone branches of ansibe/ansible #788
Comments
yurnov
added a commit
to yurnov/kubernetes.core
that referenced
this issue
Nov 2, 2024
this commit is to fix the github actions issue ansible-collections#788 and includes a changes for ansible 2.19 and 2.18 with python 3.13
This was referenced Nov 2, 2024
softwarefactory-project-zuul bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 4, 2024
This PR includes a trivial fix for the GitHub Actions issue #788 and related to switching milestone and devel branches of ansible/ansible to version 2.19 and prepare repo to be ready to include test with Python 3.13 when ansible-network/github_actions/pull/162 is merged. ISSUE TYPE Bugfix Pull Request COMPONENT NAME GitHub actions/test Reviewed-by: Andrew Klychkov <aklychko@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Graves <mgraves@redhat.com>
Done with #789 |
patchback bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 10, 2024
This PR includes a trivial fix for the GitHub Actions issue #788 and related to switching milestone and devel branches of ansible/ansible to version 2.19 and prepare repo to be ready to include test with Python 3.13 when ansible-network/github_actions/pull/162 is merged. ISSUE TYPE Bugfix Pull Request COMPONENT NAME GitHub actions/test Reviewed-by: Andrew Klychkov <aklychko@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Graves <mgraves@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit cd68631)
patchback bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 10, 2024
This PR includes a trivial fix for the GitHub Actions issue #788 and related to switching milestone and devel branches of ansible/ansible to version 2.19 and prepare repo to be ready to include test with Python 3.13 when ansible-network/github_actions/pull/162 is merged. ISSUE TYPE Bugfix Pull Request COMPONENT NAME GitHub actions/test Reviewed-by: Andrew Klychkov <aklychko@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Graves <mgraves@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit cd68631)
This was referenced Dec 10, 2024
softwarefactory-project-zuul bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 10, 2024
This is a backport of PR #789 as merged into main (cd68631). This PR includes a trivial fix for the GitHub Actions issue #788 and related to switching milestone and devel branches of ansible/ansible to version 2.19 and prepare repo to be ready to include test with Python 3.13 when ansible-network/github_actions/pull/162 is merged. ISSUE TYPE Bugfix Pull Request COMPONENT NAME GitHub actions/test Reviewed-by: Mike Graves <mgraves@redhat.com>
softwarefactory-project-zuul bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 10, 2024
This is a backport of PR #789 as merged into main (cd68631). This PR includes a trivial fix for the GitHub Actions issue #788 and related to switching milestone and devel branches of ansible/ansible to version 2.19 and prepare repo to be ready to include test with Python 3.13 when ansible-network/github_actions/pull/162 is merged. ISSUE TYPE Bugfix Pull Request COMPONENT NAME GitHub actions/test Reviewed-by: Mike Graves <mgraves@redhat.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
SUMMARY
Starting from switch branches
devel
andmilestone
of ansible/ansible to ansible-core version 2.19 the GitHub actions for sanity checks starting to fail for any new PRs.It happened as
tests/sanity/
folder contains a some test configuration that is missed for version 2.19 of the ansible-coreISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
GitHub action/CI
ANSIBLE VERSION
COLLECTION VERSION
main branch
STEPS TO REPRODUCE
Create any new PR on this repo
EXPECTED RESULTS
All tests should be successful
ACTUAL RESULTS
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: