Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ARROW-68: Better error handling for not fully setup systems #27

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

ARROW-68: Better error handling for not fully setup systems #27

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

emkornfield
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@emkornfield
Copy link
Contributor Author

This should be ready for review. Sorry for the spam on the last pull request.

@wesm
Copy link
Member

wesm commented Mar 17, 2016

+1, thank you

@asfgit asfgit closed this in c996610 Mar 17, 2016
@emkornfield emkornfield deleted the emk_add_nice_errors_PR branch April 9, 2016 05:32
wesm pushed a commit to wesm/arrow that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2018
@wesm
PARQUET-428: Support INT96 and FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY types
0340175 
This PR adds support for INT96 and FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY types.
It modifies the examples and DebugPrint to handle these types.

Author: Deepak Majeti <deepak.majeti@hp.com>

Closes apache#27 from majetideepak/master and squashes the following commits:

5ba0a03 [Deepak Majeti] PARQUET-428: Support INT96 and FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY types
wesm pushed a commit to wesm/arrow that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2018
@julienledem
PARQUET-428: Support INT96 and FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY types
aa03414 
This PR adds support for INT96 and FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY types.
It modifies the examples and DebugPrint to handle these types.

Author: Deepak Majeti <deepak.majeti@hp.com>

Closes apache#27 from majetideepak/master and squashes the following commits:

5ba0a03 [Deepak Majeti] PARQUET-428: Support INT96 and FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY types

Change-Id: I8c86350ae1245582dba6167b18f5cc92cd35e7f9
wesm pushed a commit to wesm/arrow that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2018
@julienledem
PARQUET-428: Support INT96 and FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY types
a905a84 
This PR adds support for INT96 and FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY types.
It modifies the examples and DebugPrint to handle these types.

Author: Deepak Majeti <deepak.majeti@hp.com>

Closes apache#27 from majetideepak/master and squashes the following commits:

5ba0a03 [Deepak Majeti] PARQUET-428: Support INT96 and FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY types

Change-Id: I8c86350ae1245582dba6167b18f5cc92cd35e7f9
wesm pushed a commit to wesm/arrow that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2018
@julienledem
PARQUET-428: Support INT96 and FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY types
877aa55 
This PR adds support for INT96 and FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY types.
It modifies the examples and DebugPrint to handle these types.

Author: Deepak Majeti <deepak.majeti@hp.com>

Closes apache#27 from majetideepak/master and squashes the following commits:

5ba0a03 [Deepak Majeti] PARQUET-428: Support INT96 and FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY types

Change-Id: I8c86350ae1245582dba6167b18f5cc92cd35e7f9
wesm pushed a commit to wesm/arrow that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2018
@julienledem
PARQUET-428: Support INT96 and FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY types
2152bfc 
This PR adds support for INT96 and FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY types.
It modifies the examples and DebugPrint to handle these types.

Author: Deepak Majeti <deepak.majeti@hp.com>

Closes apache#27 from majetideepak/master and squashes the following commits:

5ba0a03 [Deepak Majeti] PARQUET-428: Support INT96 and FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY types

Change-Id: I8c86350ae1245582dba6167b18f5cc92cd35e7f9
@guyuqi guyuqi mentioned this pull request Nov 22, 2018
Closed
@brills brills mentioned this pull request Jun 4, 2019
Closed
kou pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2020
@kiszk @kou
ARROW-8754: [C++][CI] Enable additional tests on s390x
392cb9e 
This PR enables tests for `ARROW_COMPUTE`, `ARROW_DATASET`, `ARROW_FILESYSTEM`, `ARROW_HDFS`, `ARROW_ORC`, and `ARROW_IPC` (default on). #7131 enabled a minimal set of tests as a starting point.

I confirmed that these tests pass locally with the current master. In the current TravisCI environment, we cannot see this result due to a lot of error messages in `arrow-utility-test`.

```
$ git log | head -1
commit ed5f534
% ctest
...
      Start  1: arrow-array-test
 1/51 Test  #1: arrow-array-test .....................   Passed    4.62 sec
      Start  2: arrow-buffer-test
 2/51 Test  #2: arrow-buffer-test ....................   Passed    0.14 sec
      Start  3: arrow-extension-type-test
 3/51 Test  #3: arrow-extension-type-test ............   Passed    0.12 sec
      Start  4: arrow-misc-test
 4/51 Test  #4: arrow-misc-test ......................   Passed    0.14 sec
      Start  5: arrow-public-api-test
 5/51 Test  #5: arrow-public-api-test ................   Passed    0.12 sec
      Start  6: arrow-scalar-test
 6/51 Test  #6: arrow-scalar-test ....................   Passed    0.13 sec
      Start  7: arrow-type-test
 7/51 Test  #7: arrow-type-test ......................   Passed    0.14 sec
      Start  8: arrow-table-test
 8/51 Test  #8: arrow-table-test .....................   Passed    0.13 sec
      Start  9: arrow-tensor-test
 9/51 Test  #9: arrow-tensor-test ....................   Passed    0.13 sec
      Start 10: arrow-sparse-tensor-test
10/51 Test #10: arrow-sparse-tensor-test .............   Passed    0.16 sec
      Start 11: arrow-stl-test
11/51 Test #11: arrow-stl-test .......................   Passed    0.12 sec
      Start 12: arrow-concatenate-test
12/51 Test #12: arrow-concatenate-test ...............   Passed    0.53 sec
      Start 13: arrow-diff-test
13/51 Test #13: arrow-diff-test ......................   Passed    1.45 sec
      Start 14: arrow-c-bridge-test
14/51 Test #14: arrow-c-bridge-test ..................   Passed    0.18 sec
      Start 15: arrow-io-buffered-test
15/51 Test #15: arrow-io-buffered-test ...............   Passed    0.20 sec
      Start 16: arrow-io-compressed-test
16/51 Test #16: arrow-io-compressed-test .............   Passed    3.48 sec
      Start 17: arrow-io-file-test
17/51 Test #17: arrow-io-file-test ...................   Passed    0.74 sec
      Start 18: arrow-io-hdfs-test
18/51 Test #18: arrow-io-hdfs-test ...................   Passed    0.12 sec
      Start 19: arrow-io-memory-test
19/51 Test #19: arrow-io-memory-test .................   Passed    2.77 sec
      Start 20: arrow-utility-test
20/51 Test #20: arrow-utility-test ...................***Failed    5.65 sec
      Start 21: arrow-threading-utility-test
21/51 Test #21: arrow-threading-utility-test .........   Passed    1.34 sec
      Start 22: arrow-compute-compute-test
22/51 Test #22: arrow-compute-compute-test ...........   Passed    0.13 sec
      Start 23: arrow-compute-boolean-test
23/51 Test #23: arrow-compute-boolean-test ...........   Passed    0.15 sec
      Start 24: arrow-compute-cast-test
24/51 Test #24: arrow-compute-cast-test ..............   Passed    0.22 sec
      Start 25: arrow-compute-hash-test
25/51 Test #25: arrow-compute-hash-test ..............   Passed    2.61 sec
      Start 26: arrow-compute-isin-test
26/51 Test #26: arrow-compute-isin-test ..............   Passed    0.81 sec
      Start 27: arrow-compute-match-test
27/51 Test #27: arrow-compute-match-test .............   Passed    0.40 sec
      Start 28: arrow-compute-sort-to-indices-test
28/51 Test #28: arrow-compute-sort-to-indices-test ...   Passed    3.33 sec
      Start 29: arrow-compute-nth-to-indices-test
29/51 Test #29: arrow-compute-nth-to-indices-test ....   Passed    1.51 sec
      Start 30: arrow-compute-util-internal-test
30/51 Test #30: arrow-compute-util-internal-test .....   Passed    0.13 sec
      Start 31: arrow-compute-add-test
31/51 Test #31: arrow-compute-add-test ...............   Passed    0.12 sec
      Start 32: arrow-compute-aggregate-test
32/51 Test #32: arrow-compute-aggregate-test .........   Passed   14.70 sec
      Start 33: arrow-compute-compare-test
33/51 Test #33: arrow-compute-compare-test ...........   Passed    7.96 sec
      Start 34: arrow-compute-take-test
34/51 Test #34: arrow-compute-take-test ..............   Passed    4.80 sec
      Start 35: arrow-compute-filter-test
35/51 Test #35: arrow-compute-filter-test ............   Passed    8.23 sec
      Start 36: arrow-dataset-dataset-test
36/51 Test #36: arrow-dataset-dataset-test ...........   Passed    0.25 sec
      Start 37: arrow-dataset-discovery-test
37/51 Test #37: arrow-dataset-discovery-test .........   Passed    0.13 sec
      Start 38: arrow-dataset-file-ipc-test
38/51 Test #38: arrow-dataset-file-ipc-test ..........   Passed    0.21 sec
      Start 39: arrow-dataset-file-test
39/51 Test #39: arrow-dataset-file-test ..............   Passed    0.12 sec
      Start 40: arrow-dataset-filter-test
40/51 Test #40: arrow-dataset-filter-test ............   Passed    0.16 sec
      Start 41: arrow-dataset-partition-test
41/51 Test #41: arrow-dataset-partition-test .........   Passed    0.13 sec
      Start 42: arrow-dataset-scanner-test
42/51 Test #42: arrow-dataset-scanner-test ...........   Passed    0.20 sec
      Start 43: arrow-filesystem-test
43/51 Test #43: arrow-filesystem-test ................   Passed    1.62 sec
      Start 44: arrow-hdfs-test
44/51 Test #44: arrow-hdfs-test ......................   Passed    0.13 sec
      Start 45: arrow-feather-test
45/51 Test #45: arrow-feather-test ...................   Passed    0.91 sec
      Start 46: arrow-ipc-read-write-test
46/51 Test #46: arrow-ipc-read-write-test ............   Passed    5.77 sec
      Start 47: arrow-ipc-json-simple-test
47/51 Test #47: arrow-ipc-json-simple-test ...........   Passed    0.16 sec
      Start 48: arrow-ipc-json-test
48/51 Test #48: arrow-ipc-json-test ..................   Passed    0.27 sec
      Start 49: arrow-json-integration-test
49/51 Test #49: arrow-json-integration-test ..........   Passed    0.13 sec
      Start 50: arrow-json-test
50/51 Test #50: arrow-json-test ......................   Passed    0.26 sec
      Start 51: arrow-orc-adapter-test
51/51 Test #51: arrow-orc-adapter-test ...............   Passed    1.92 sec

98% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 51

Label Time Summary:
arrow-tests      =  27.38 sec (27 tests)
arrow_compute    =  45.11 sec (14 tests)
arrow_dataset    =   1.21 sec (7 tests)
arrow_ipc        =   6.20 sec (3 tests)
unittest         =  79.91 sec (51 tests)

Total Test time (real) =  79.99 sec

The following tests FAILED:
	 20 - arrow-utility-test (Failed)
Errors while running CTest
```

Closes #7142 from kiszk/ARROW-8754

Authored-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
rui-mo pushed a commit to rui-mo/arrow-1 that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2021
@zhztheplayer
Create utility dir arrow/jniutil (apache#27)
816d602 
* Create utility dir arrow/jniutil

* fix
zhztheplayer added a commit to zhztheplayer/arrow-1 that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2022
@zhztheplayer
Create utility dir arrow/jniutil (apache#27)
1cb9889 
* Create utility dir arrow/jniutil

* fix
zhztheplayer added a commit to zhztheplayer/arrow-1 that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2022
@zhztheplayer
Create utility dir arrow/jniutil (apache#27)
2a8a28c 
* Create utility dir arrow/jniutil

* fix
zhztheplayer added a commit to zhztheplayer/arrow-1 that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2022
@zhztheplayer
Create utility dir arrow/jniutil (apache#27)
360a506 
* Create utility dir arrow/jniutil

* fix
zhztheplayer added a commit to zhztheplayer/arrow-1 that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2022
@zhztheplayer
Create utility dir arrow/jniutil (apache#27)
75432e6 
* Create utility dir arrow/jniutil

* fix
rui-mo pushed a commit to rui-mo/arrow-1 that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2022
@zhztheplayer
Create utility dir arrow/jniutil (apache#27)
3e92680 
* Create utility dir arrow/jniutil

* fix
zhouyuan pushed a commit to zhouyuan/arrow that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2022
@zhztheplayer
Create utility dir arrow/jniutil (apache#27)
e178c00 
* Create utility dir arrow/jniutil

* fix
@helloqingbing helloqingbing mentioned this pull request Jun 8, 2022
Closed
jayhomn-bitquill pushed a commit to Bit-Quill/arrow that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
@jcralmeida
Merge pull request apache#27 from rafael-telles/tls-truststore-fix
4311bfa 
Refactor jdbc tls connection to use trustStore correctly
@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche mentioned this pull request Oct 6, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@emkornfield @wesm