Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exclude a not yet implemented pandas op from dataframe tests. #32066

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2024

Conversation

tvalentyn
Copy link
Contributor

Please add a meaningful description for your change here


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

@tvalentyn
Copy link
Contributor Author

R: @ahmedabu98

@github-actions github-actions bot added the python label Aug 2, 2024
@tvalentyn tvalentyn changed the title Exclude a not yet implemented pandas op. Exclude a not yet implemented pandas op from dataframe tests. Aug 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 2, 2024

Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment assign set of reviewers

Copy link
Contributor

@ahmedabu98 ahmedabu98 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Lgtm

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 57.18%. Comparing base (202fa56) to head (498b956).
Report is 10 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master   #32066   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     57.18%   57.18%           
  Complexity     1474     1474           
=========================================
  Files           963      963           
  Lines        152697   152707   +10     
  Branches       1076     1076           
=========================================
+ Hits          87313    87320    +7     
- Misses        63202    63205    +3     
  Partials       2182     2182           
Flag Coverage Δ
python 81.27% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tvalentyn tvalentyn merged commit 9b564ef into apache:master Aug 7, 2024
99 checks passed
@tvalentyn tvalentyn deleted the pandas branch August 7, 2024 00:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants