Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): Bump dependency versions #840

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 29, 2022
Merged

Conversation

christophd
Copy link
Contributor

  • Jackson v2.13.3
  • Logback v1.2.11
  • Logstash logback encoder v7.2

- Jackson v2.13.3
- Logback v1.2.11
- Logstash logback encoder v7.2
<jackson-databind-version>2.9.10.8</jackson-databind-version>
<logback-version>1.2.11</logback-version>
<logstash-logback-version>7.2</logstash-logback-version>
<jackson-version>2.13.3</jackson-version>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

jackson-core and jackson-databind versions might differ. Is it really ok to combine them?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think in general these two should align. There have been quick fixes to jackson-databind in the past that made versions diverge but I think this should not be the usual case.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, we can add a dedicate property when/if it is really needed

@squakez squakez merged commit e6238b4 into apache:main Jun 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants