quarkus master split #5922
quarkus master split #5922
Conversation
lburgazzoli
commented
Mar 25, 2024
lburgazzoli
commented
- Move Kubernetes cluster service to its own module
- Move FileLock cluster service to its own module
lburgazzoli
force-pushed
the
quarkus-master-split
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b249251
to
bf045a2
Compare
lburgazzoli
force-pushed
the
quarkus-master-split
branch
2 times, most recently
from
d01aadf
to
d523949
Compare
...nsions/kubernetes-cluster-service/runtime/src/main/resources/META-INF/quarkus-extension.yaml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
lburgazzoli
force-pushed
the
quarkus-master-split
branch
from
d523949
to
c28dbde
Compare
lburgazzoli
force-pushed
the
quarkus-master-split
branch
from
c28dbde
to
3fcbca3
Compare
lburgazzoli
force-pushed
the
quarkus-master-split
branch
from
3fcbca3
to
c270762
Compare
|
@jamesnetherton @zhfeng it should be ready now |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@lburgazzoli please check the CI failures, it looks cluster-leader-election examples is not working due to these changnes?
extensions/telegram/runtime/src/main/resources/META-INF/quarkus-extension.yaml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
I guess the fix should be done in the camel-quarkus-examples ? but there is a chicken-egg problem as the camel-quarkus-file-cluster-service won't be available till this get merged so a pr on the camel-quarkus-examples would probably fail. |
lburgazzoli
force-pushed
the
quarkus-master-split
branch
from
c270762
to
813493c
Compare
lburgazzoli
force-pushed
the
quarkus-master-split
branch
from
813493c
to
cacfc65
Compare
|
@jamesnetherton @zhfeng what should I do with this ? I can temporarily rework the example not to require any cluster service extension if it makes sense |
If you're ok leaving this PR open until after we get the 3.9.0 release completed (hopefully tomorrow / thursday), then afterwards we can just merge this and immediately adjust the example project. |
|
no objections |
