Jt400: possible missing resource in the native

[JiriOndrusek]

fixes #6029

[zhfeng]

@JiriOndrusek is it possible to add an unit test?

[JiriOndrusek]

@JiriOndrusek is it possible to add an unit test?

I'm thinking about that, I can try. Although the test would cover a scenario which does not make sense

[JiriOndrusek]

@zhfeng test is added

[JiriOndrusek]

@zhfeng I have to check again, whether the added test can not affect existing one when executed in different order

[JiriOndrusek]

@zhfeng I have to check again, whether the added test can not affect existing one when executed in different order

I run the tests ordered with new method at the first place and at last place and there was no issue.

[JiriOndrusek]

@jamesnetherton As I think about the test coverage, it makes sense to me to move the test into jt400-mocked, because it does not require a real service and the test would be executed by CI (if the test is part of jt400-mocked.

Of course I have to try , whether it is possible). WDYT.

[jamesnetherton]

move the test into jt400-mocked

Sounds ok to me. Or if we need to have it duplicated in both mocked and non-mocked, that's fine too.

[JiriOndrusek]

move the test into jt400-mocked

Sounds ok to me. Or if we need to have it duplicated in both mocked and non-mocked, that's fine too.

Duplication (even if should be avoided) sounds like the right solution
.

[JiriOndrusek]

I added the new test intojt400-mocked (as duplication)
Therefore it should be fulfilled that at leas one of jt400 and jt400-mocked is executed.