Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CASSGO-40: skip metadata only if prepared result included metadata #1852

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

jameshartig
Copy link
Contributor

If the prepare result doesn't include metadata we shouldn't skip metadata when executing the query. Fixes CASSGO-40.

Patch by James Hartig for CASSGO-40

@jameshartig jameshartig changed the title skip metadata only if prepared result included metadata CASSGO-40 skip metadata only if prepared result included metadata Dec 26, 2024
@jameshartig jameshartig changed the title CASSGO-40 skip metadata only if prepared result included metadata CASSGO-40: skip metadata only if prepared result included metadata Dec 27, 2024
@joao-r-reis
Copy link
Contributor

joao-r-reis commented Jan 29, 2025

I believe this is already handled in #1822 can you double check? I believe this change was required to support the new result metadata id flag in v5

@jameshartig
Copy link
Contributor Author

@joao-r-reis It wasn't handled but we could do it in there if we wanted to. I left a comment here.

@joao-r-reis
Copy link
Contributor

joao-r-reis commented Jan 29, 2025

Yeah let's merge this first, don't forget to add me as a reviewer to the commit msg 👍

If the prepare result doesn't include metadata we shouldn't skip metadata
when executing the query. Fixes CASSGO-40.

Patch by James Hartig; reviewed by João Reis for CASSGO-40
@jameshartig jameshartig merged commit 91cbf12 into apache:trunk Jan 30, 2025
2 checks passed
@jameshartig jameshartig deleted the no-metadata branch January 30, 2025 15:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants