Add minimum details parameter to Search View's listDomains

[gpordeus]

Description

This PR adds the details: min parameter to listDomains API call. Since they are used only for ids and names, more details are unnecessary and listDomains ends up taking a long time to execute when many domains exist.

In a test environment with 5000 domains, running time cmk listDomains yielded cmk listDomains 0,31s user 0,11s system 1% cpu 31,200 total, but time cmk listDomains details=min yielded cmk listDomains details=min 0,14s user 0,04s system 7% cpu 2,521 total.

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• build/CI
• test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Before:

After:

How Has This Been Tested?

I set up an environment with 5000 domains and unlimited page size.

I then checked the Network tab on the browser before and after the changes (see Screenshots).

Searching itself worked normally.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 15.57%. Comparing base (d7ca05e) to head (a8f1503).
Report is 24 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #9616      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     15.57%   15.57%   -0.01%     
- Complexity    12037    12048      +11     
============================================
  Files          5501     5505       +4     
  Lines        482219   482621     +402     
  Branches      62044    60641    -1403     
============================================
+ Hits          75125    75175      +50     
- Misses       398791   399140     +349     
- Partials       8303     8306       +3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	4.16% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unittests	16.35% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[DaanHoogland]

@blueorangutan ui

[blueorangutan]

@DaanHoogland a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[shwstppr]

Code LGTM. I guess this should be done for other forms too

[blueorangutan]

UI build: ✔️
Live QA URL: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/simulator/pr/9616 (QA-JID-437)

[DaanHoogland]

Code LGTM. I guess this should be done for other forms too

most probably, but I think we can merge this (and create an issue for the rest or a discussion to do the inventarisation)