[Improvement][Test] Block the usage of powermock and move mockito dependencies from sub-modules to root pom

[EricGao888]

Purpose of the pull request

• This PR closes: [Improvement][Test] Block the usage of Powermock #11637
• This PR also closes: [Improvement][Test] Remove dependency of powermock #11405

Brief change log

• Move mockito dependencies from sub-modules to root pom.
• Add a new step in Spotless to block the usage of powermock .

Verify this pull request

• Verified by UT cases and manual tests.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #12311 (928e5d5) into dev (875682d) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                dev   #12311      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     38.62%   38.60%   -0.02%     
- Complexity     4101     4104       +3     
============================================
  Files          1031     1031              
  Lines         38459    38459              
  Branches       4404     4402       -2     
============================================
- Hits          14854    14848       -6     
- Misses        21872    21881       +9     
+ Partials       1733     1730       -3     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...r/plugin/registry/zookeeper/ZookeeperRegistry.java	43.54% <0.00%> (-6.46%)	⬇️
...pache/dolphinscheduler/common/utils/DateUtils.java	74.69% <0.00%> (+0.61%)	⬆️
...r/plugin/task/sqoop/parameter/SqoopParameters.java	56.41% <0.00%> (+1.28%)	⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[EricGao888]

Currently we use check in CI but apply in pre-commit hook as execution goal of Spotless, see:

dolphinscheduler/pom.xml

Lines 679 to 686 in 04e1b88

	<executions>
	<execution>
	<goals>
	<goal>check</goal>
	</goals>
	<phase>compile</phase>
	</execution>
	</executions>

dolphinscheduler/.pre-commit-config.yaml

Lines 58 to 65 in 04e1b88

	- repo: local
	hooks:
	# Spotless Hooks
	- id: spotless
	name: spotless lint
	entry: ./mvnw spotless:apply
	language: script
	pass_filenames: false

I'm thinking about changing the apply in pre-commit hook to check. The reason is if I add a regex step to block import org.powermock.*, contributors may get quite confused when pre-commit hook automatically deletes the import, just the same as the wildcard imports we discussed before: #11458 (comment)

WDYT @kezhenxu94 @zhongjiajie

[kezhenxu94]

I'm thinking about changing the apply in pre-commit hook to check. The reason is if I add a regex step to block import org.powermock.*, contributors may get quite confused when pre-commit hook automatically deletes the import, just the same as the wildcard imports we discussed before: #11458 (comment)

WDYT @kezhenxu94 @zhongjiajie

Sounds good to me

[zhongjiajie]

Currently we use check in CI but apply in pre-commit hook as execution goal of Spotless, see:

dolphinscheduler/pom.xml

Lines 679 to 686 in 04e1b88

	<executions>
	<execution>
	<goals>
	<goal>check</goal>
	</goals>
	<phase>compile</phase>
	</execution>
	</executions>

dolphinscheduler/.pre-commit-config.yaml

Lines 58 to 65 in 04e1b88

	- repo: local
	hooks:
	# Spotless Hooks
	- id: spotless
	name: spotless lint
	entry: ./mvnw spotless:apply
	language: script
	pass_filenames: false

I'm thinking about changing the apply in pre-commit hook to check. The reason is if I add a regex step to block import org.powermock.*, contributors may get quite confused when pre-commit hook automatically deletes the import, just the same as the wildcard imports we discussed before: #11458 (comment)

WDYT @kezhenxu94 @zhongjiajie

+1 for me

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication

[EricGao888]

PTAL when available, thx~ @kezhenxu94 @caishunfeng @ruanwenjun @SbloodyS @zhongjiajie