-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[fix](memtracker) Remove mem tracker record mem pool actual memory usage #12954
Merged
yiguolei
merged 1 commit into
apache:master
from
xinyiZzz:20220925_fix_flush_mem_table_push
Sep 26, 2022
Merged
[fix](memtracker) Remove mem tracker record mem pool actual memory usage #12954
yiguolei
merged 1 commit into
apache:master
from
xinyiZzz:20220925_fix_flush_mem_table_push
Sep 26, 2022
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
xinyiZzz
force-pushed
the
20220925_fix_flush_mem_table_push
branch
from
September 25, 2022 18:13
d7dc181
to
9062329
Compare
dataroaring
approved these changes
Sep 26, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
github-actions
bot
added
approved
Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer.
reviewed
labels
Sep 26, 2022
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
13 tasks
FreeOnePlus
pushed a commit
to FreeOnePlus/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2022
…age apache#12954 In order to avoid different mem tracker consumption values of multiple queries/loads, and the difference between the virtual memory of alloc and the physical memory actually increased by the process. The memory alloc in PODArray and mempool will not be recorded in the query/load mem tracker immediately, but will be gradually recorded in the mem tracker during the memory usage. But mem pool allocates memory from chunk allocator. If this chunk is used after the second time, it may have used physical memory. The above mechanism will cause the load channel memory statistics to be less than the actual value.
FreeOnePlus
pushed a commit
to FreeOnePlus/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2022
…age apache#12954 In order to avoid different mem tracker consumption values of multiple queries/loads, and the difference between the virtual memory of alloc and the physical memory actually increased by the process. The memory alloc in PODArray and mempool will not be recorded in the query/load mem tracker immediately, but will be gradually recorded in the mem tracker during the memory usage. But mem pool allocates memory from chunk allocator. If this chunk is used after the second time, it may have used physical memory. The above mechanism will cause the load channel memory statistics to be less than the actual value.
FreeOnePlus
pushed a commit
to FreeOnePlus/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2022
…age apache#12954 In order to avoid different mem tracker consumption values of multiple queries/loads, and the difference between the virtual memory of alloc and the physical memory actually increased by the process. The memory alloc in PODArray and mempool will not be recorded in the query/load mem tracker immediately, but will be gradually recorded in the mem tracker during the memory usage. But mem pool allocates memory from chunk allocator. If this chunk is used after the second time, it may have used physical memory. The above mechanism will cause the load channel memory statistics to be less than the actual value.
FreeOnePlus
pushed a commit
to FreeOnePlus/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2022
…age apache#12954 In order to avoid different mem tracker consumption values of multiple queries/loads, and the difference between the virtual memory of alloc and the physical memory actually increased by the process. The memory alloc in PODArray and mempool will not be recorded in the query/load mem tracker immediately, but will be gradually recorded in the mem tracker during the memory usage. But mem pool allocates memory from chunk allocator. If this chunk is used after the second time, it may have used physical memory. The above mechanism will cause the load channel memory statistics to be less than the actual value.
FreeOnePlus
pushed a commit
to FreeOnePlus/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2022
…age apache#12954 In order to avoid different mem tracker consumption values of multiple queries/loads, and the difference between the virtual memory of alloc and the physical memory actually increased by the process. The memory alloc in PODArray and mempool will not be recorded in the query/load mem tracker immediately, but will be gradually recorded in the mem tracker during the memory usage. But mem pool allocates memory from chunk allocator. If this chunk is used after the second time, it may have used physical memory. The above mechanism will cause the load channel memory statistics to be less than the actual value.
FreeOnePlus
pushed a commit
to FreeOnePlus/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2022
…age apache#12954 In order to avoid different mem tracker consumption values of multiple queries/loads, and the difference between the virtual memory of alloc and the physical memory actually increased by the process. The memory alloc in PODArray and mempool will not be recorded in the query/load mem tracker immediately, but will be gradually recorded in the mem tracker during the memory usage. But mem pool allocates memory from chunk allocator. If this chunk is used after the second time, it may have used physical memory. The above mechanism will cause the load channel memory statistics to be less than the actual value.
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
approved
Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer.
area/memory-consumption
dev/merged-1.1.3-deprecated
reviewed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
Issue Number: close #xxx
Problem summary
In order to avoid different mem tracker consumption values of multiple queries/loads, and the difference between the virtual memory of alloc and the physical memory actually increased by the process.
The memory alloc in PODArray and mempool will not be recorded in the query/load mem tracker immediately, but will be gradually recorded in the mem tracker during the memory usage.
But mem pool allocates memory from chunk allocator. If this chunk is used after the second time, it may have used physical memory. The above mechanism will cause the load channel memory statistics to be less than the actual value.
Checklist(Required)
Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...