-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(sec): upgrade com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java to 3.16.1 #6960
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
xushiyan
added
priority:minor
everything else; usability gaps; questions; feature reqs
dependencies
Pull requests that update a dependency file
labels
Oct 31, 2022
codope
force-pushed
the
oscs_fix_cd5s340au51t5k2gfie0
branch
from
December 7, 2022 12:50
09dc9ed
to
9d08a28
Compare
codope
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can land once CI is green.
codope
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2022
* Fixes https://www.oscs1024.com/hd/CVE-2015-5237 Co-authored-by: Sagar Sumit <sagarsumit09@gmail.com>
nsivabalan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2022
* Fixes https://www.oscs1024.com/hd/CVE-2015-5237 Co-authored-by: Sagar Sumit <sagarsumit09@gmail.com>
alexeykudinkin
pushed a commit
to onehouseinc/hudi
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2022
* Fixes https://www.oscs1024.com/hd/CVE-2015-5237 Co-authored-by: Sagar Sumit <sagarsumit09@gmail.com>
alexeykudinkin
pushed a commit
to onehouseinc/hudi
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2022
* Fixes https://www.oscs1024.com/hd/CVE-2015-5237 Co-authored-by: Sagar Sumit <sagarsumit09@gmail.com>
alexeykudinkin
pushed a commit
to onehouseinc/hudi
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2022
* Fixes https://www.oscs1024.com/hd/CVE-2015-5237 Co-authored-by: Sagar Sumit <sagarsumit09@gmail.com>
alexeykudinkin
pushed a commit
to onehouseinc/hudi
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2022
* Fixes https://www.oscs1024.com/hd/CVE-2015-5237 Co-authored-by: Sagar Sumit <sagarsumit09@gmail.com>
alexeykudinkin
pushed a commit
to onehouseinc/hudi
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2022
* Fixes https://www.oscs1024.com/hd/CVE-2015-5237 Co-authored-by: Sagar Sumit <sagarsumit09@gmail.com>
alexeykudinkin
pushed a commit
to onehouseinc/hudi
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2022
* Fixes https://www.oscs1024.com/hd/CVE-2015-5237 Co-authored-by: Sagar Sumit <sagarsumit09@gmail.com>
fengjian428
pushed a commit
to fengjian428/hudi
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2023
* Fixes https://www.oscs1024.com/hd/CVE-2015-5237 Co-authored-by: Sagar Sumit <sagarsumit09@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies
Pull requests that update a dependency file
priority:minor
everything else; usability gaps; questions; feature reqs
release-0.12.2
Patches targetted for 0.12.2
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What happened?
There are 1 security vulnerabilities found in com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java 2.5.0
What did I do?
Upgrade com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java from 2.5.0 to 3.16.1 for vulnerability fix
What did you expect to happen?
Ideally, no insecure libs should be used.
How was this patch tested?
Run
mvn compile
failed locally, couldn't complete the build process.Run
mvn clean test
failed locally, unit-test couldn't pass.The specification of the pull request
PR Specification from OSCS