Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

security: upgrade jettison to 1.5.4 #6145

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 14, 2023

Conversation

slievrly
Copy link
Member

  • I have registered the PR changes.

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

upgrade jettison to 1.5.4

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

fixes #6140

Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

@funky-eyes funky-eyes added this to the 2.1.0 milestone Dec 13, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 13, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #6145 (8e6153f) into 2.x (8984880) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x    #6145      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     49.01%   49.00%   -0.01%     
  Complexity     4777     4777              
============================================
  Files           913      913              
  Lines         31710    31710              
  Branches       3827     3827              
============================================
- Hits          15542    15539       -3     
- Misses        14627    14629       +2     
- Partials       1541     1542       +1     

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Contributor

@leizhiyuan leizhiyuan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@wangliang181230 wangliang181230 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
4 participants