Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pipe: CreatePipe and AlterPipe support now function #14014

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 8, 2024

Conversation

luoluoyuyu
Copy link
Contributor

Description

As the title said


This PR has:

  • been self-reviewed.
    • concurrent read
    • concurrent write
    • concurrent read and write
  • added documentation for new or modified features or behaviors.
  • added Javadocs for most classes and all non-trivial methods.
  • added or updated version, license, or notice information
  • added comments explaining the "why" and the intent of the code wherever would not be obvious
    for an unfamiliar reader.
  • added unit tests or modified existing tests to cover new code paths, ensuring the threshold
    for code coverage.
  • added integration tests.
  • been tested in a test IoTDB cluster.

Key changed/added classes (or packages if there are too many classes) in this PR

@SteveYurongSu SteveYurongSu self-assigned this Nov 7, 2024
@luoluoyuyu luoluoyuyu changed the title Pipe: CreatePipe and AlterPipe support now() function Pipe: CreatePipe and AlterPipe support now function Nov 7, 2024
@SteveYurongSu SteveYurongSu merged commit 859d37f into apache:master Nov 8, 2024
27 checks passed
SteveYurongSu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2024
…y LocalDate caused by TabletInsertionDataContainer (related to #13990) (related to #14014) (#14025)
luoluoyuyu added a commit to luoluoyuyu/iotdb that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2024
@luoluoyuyu luoluoyuyu deleted the pipe-support-now-func branch November 12, 2024 08:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants