-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 473
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow to get the latest sequence number when creating the backup #1987
Conversation
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ Status Storage::CreateBackup() { | |||
} | |||
|
|||
std::unique_ptr<rocksdb::Checkpoint> checkpoint_guard(checkpoint); | |||
s = checkpoint->CreateCheckpoint(tmpdir, config_->rocks_db.write_buffer_size * MiB); | |||
s = checkpoint->CreateCheckpoint(tmpdir, config_->rocks_db.write_buffer_size * MiB, sequence_number); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a question:
// sequence_number_ptr: if it is not nullptr, the value it points to will be
// set to a sequence number guaranteed to be part of the DB, not necessarily
// the latest. The default value of this parameter is nullptr.
From rocksdb, seems this might a bit less than backup? Or I misunderstanding this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe, I didn't investigate when it would be less than the DB.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was introduced here: facebook/rocksdb@3ffb3ba
Maybe we should notice user to pay-attention to that, replaying kv might not harm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mapleFU I have updated the comment to address this, please take a look again.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have confirmed the implementation, it is the latest sequence number while starting to create the checkpoint, so it should be less the current backup DB if has any writes during this process.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I guess maybe it's not atomic between:
*sequence_number = db_->GetLatestSequenceNumber();
LiveFilesStorageInfoOptions opts;
opts.include_checksum_info = get_live_table_checksum;
opts.wal_size_for_flush = log_size_for_flush;
std::vector<LiveFileStorageInfo> infos;
{
Status s = db_->GetLiveFilesStorageInfo(opts, &infos);
Quality Gate passedKudos, no new issues were introduced! 0 New issues |
As mentioned in #1986, some users want to know the sequence number of the backup
for the increment backup scenario. Fortunately, rocksdb allows us to get the sequence
number when creating the checkpoint. So what we need to do is to pass the receiver.