Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Port log4j-1.2-api changes from 2.x #2188

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jan 15, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ppkarwasz
Copy link
Contributor

This PR ports several changes to the log4j-1.2-api module that are present in 2.x, but were never ported to main.

@ppkarwasz ppkarwasz self-assigned this Jan 12, 2024
Copy link
Member

@vy vy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is difficult to review this PR. Given you haven't removed any tests, on the contrary, added more, and build still passes... What can go wrong? Right? 😅

ppkarwasz and others added 9 commits January 15, 2024 15:50
The `Category` class constructor should not use the static method
`LogManager.getLoggerRepository()` to find the `LoggerRepository` that
created it. The value should be injected.
This fixes Spotbugs alerts up to rank 9 (the "scary" category).

Most are false positives or problems in the tests. The `LocationInfo`
fix in `log4j-1.2-api` prevents an NPE though.
Adds a builder for Apache Extras' `RollingFileAppender`.
…vior (apache#924)

The current `LevelRangeFilterBuilder` does not take into account the inversion of the level scale between Log4j 1 and Log4j 2: a minimal Log4j 1 level corresponds to a maximal Log4j 2 level and vice versa.
This ports the changes to the `log4j-1.2-api` module that never made it
to `main`.

Part of apache#2163.
@ppkarwasz ppkarwasz merged commit c71bdf8 into apache:main Jan 15, 2024
3 of 6 checks passed
@ppkarwasz ppkarwasz deleted the sync-1.2-api branch February 15, 2024 15:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants