-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.8k
#13385 [Clojure] - Turn examples into integration tests #13554
Conversation
Thanks so much @hellonico for tackling this. This will be a big improvement to stability and regression of the package as we develop it. The way you are approaching it with a minimum test and then the script seems like the right direction. 😸 |
ff8b2c2
to
1fe4fc3
Compare
The following examples are turned into integration tests: SuperPinkicious:examples niko$ find . -name test rnn has a training section and a test trained network section, but the training section is very, very, very slow |
@hellonico - Awesome work! |
a4b6217
to
0fb305f
Compare
Good morning ! |
0fb305f
to
ba812a4
Compare
Great! I’ll take a look on Monday. Thanks!
Have a good rest of the weekend
:)
Carin
…On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 9:39 PM Nicolas Modrzyk ***@***.***> wrote:
Good morning !
Great. Just squashed the commits ... and rebased on master.
—
You are receiving this because your review was requested.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#13554 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAUxS-canYs9mrGwrz-E-AJKtb0M5D6Uks5u3HfwgaJpZM4ZFsnX>
.
|
e6f0888
to
af4706b
Compare
Any idea on how to avoid the (de facto not very possible) license check on json files ? |
485e15f
to
0e32e40
Compare
Checked on OSX, and on two linux boxes: Finally ... |
Awesome work! I think we can get the CI to pass the RAT check if you put the files having trouble:
It gets called from here https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/master/ci/docker/runtime_functions.sh#L996 @marcoabreu Do you have thoughts on how these integration tests should be integrated in the CI? Should it be nightly since they run pretty long? Should we merge this first and then open another one for integrating into the CI? |
Yeah nightly would be a good place. I'll leave it up to you whether we do it in this PR or a separate one. But I think a separate one is a good idea |
90cd3bd
to
53709c4
Compare
Ready to be merged ! Let's find out how much time it takes to run the suite. When the models are already there, those tests run in about 10-15 minutes on a slow machine. |
Thanks for taking this on and making it happen 💯 I'm going to go ahead a merge this and then we can work on adding it to the nightly tests in another PR and see how it runs there. |
* upstream/master: (38 commits) Feature/mkldnn static (apache#13628) Fix the bug of BidirectionalCell (apache#13575) Set install path for libmxnet.so dynamic lib on Mac OS (apache#13629) add batch norm test (apache#13625) Scripts for building dependency libraries of MXNet (apache#13282) fix quantize pass error when the quantization supported Op are excluded in the model (apache#13596) Optimize C++ API (apache#13496) Fix warning in waitall doc (apache#13618) [MXNET-1225] Always use config.mk in make install instructions (apache#13364) [MXNET-1224]: improve scala maven jni build and packing. (apache#13493) [MXNET-1155] Add scala packageTest utility (apache#13046) fix the Float not showing correctly problem (apache#13617) apache#13385 [Clojure] - Turn examples into integration tests (apache#13554) Add Intel MKL blas to Jenkins (apache#13607) Revert "[MXNET-1198] MXNet Java API (apache#13162)" Reducing the length of setup tutorial (apache#13306) [MXNET-1182] Predictor example (apache#13237) [MXNET-1187] Added Java SSD Inference Tutorial for website (apache#13201) add defaults and clean up the tests (apache#13295) [MXNET-1181] Added command line alternative to IntelliJ in install instructions (apache#13267) ...
!!! This is work in progress.
Would:
be ok?