Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix schema-understand doc. #11615

Conversation

congbobo184
Copy link
Contributor

now complex type example are not right, so fix it.

@codelipenghui codelipenghui added this to the 2.9.0 milestone Aug 10, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@BewareMyPower BewareMyPower left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this part of docs is initially for protobuf native schema, see #9079. Is it proper to use Avro schema as the example here?

@congbobo184
Copy link
Contributor Author

@BewareMyPower hi, I think this example is used to explain struct schema. Both avro and protobuf are good, what do you think?

@BewareMyPower
Copy link
Contributor

OK, I also just found the original doc PR is a little confused because it contains both the schema definition part and protobuf native schema part.

@Anonymitaet
Copy link
Member

Thanks for your contribution. Does this affect only master or other versioned docs?
If latter, could you please help update all affected versions? Thanks

@Anonymitaet Anonymitaet added the doc Your PR contains doc changes, no matter whether the changes are in markdown or code files. label Aug 10, 2021
@Anonymitaet Anonymitaet merged commit 723121a into apache:master Aug 10, 2021
bharanic-dev pushed a commit to bharanic-dev/pulsar that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
* Fix schema-understand doc.

* Add some version change

Co-authored-by: congbo <congbobo184@github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc Your PR contains doc changes, no matter whether the changes are in markdown or code files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants