Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[improve][broker] Make some operation messageTTL methods in Namespaces async. #15577

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 18, 2022

Conversation

shibd
Copy link
Member

@shibd shibd commented May 13, 2022

Motivation

See PIP #14365 and change tracker #15043.

Make NamespacesBase getNamespaceMessageTTL / setNamespaceMessageTTL / removeNamespaceMessageTTL methods to pure async.

Documentation

  • no-need-doc

@github-actions
Copy link

@shibd:Thanks for your contribution. For this PR, do we need to update docs?
(The PR template contains info about doc, which helps others know more about the changes. Can you provide doc-related info in this and future PR descriptions? Thanks)

@shibd shibd changed the title Make some operation messageTTL methods in Namespaces async. [improve][broker] Make some operation messageTTL methods in Namespaces async. May 13, 2022
@shibd shibd changed the title [improve][broker] Make some operation messageTTL methods in Namespaces async. [WIP] [improve][broker] Make some operation messageTTL methods in Namespaces async. May 13, 2022
@shibd shibd marked this pull request as draft May 13, 2022 08:27
@shibd shibd changed the title [WIP] [improve][broker] Make some operation messageTTL methods in Namespaces async. [improve][broker] Make some operation messageTTL methods in Namespaces async. May 13, 2022
@shibd shibd force-pushed the async_ttl_namespace branch from 2e7d7df to 139b485 Compare May 14, 2022 02:57
@shibd shibd marked this pull request as ready for review May 14, 2022 02:58
@shibd shibd force-pushed the async_ttl_namespace branch from 139b485 to 2769bc2 Compare May 14, 2022 03:11
@shibd
Copy link
Member Author

shibd commented May 14, 2022

/pulsarbot run-failure-checks

Copy link
Contributor

@Technoboy- Technoboy- left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Technoboy- Technoboy- added area/admin doc-not-needed Your PR changes do not impact docs and removed doc-label-missing labels May 14, 2022
@Technoboy- Technoboy- added this to the 2.11.0 milestone May 14, 2022
@shibd
Copy link
Member Author

shibd commented May 14, 2022

@Technoboy- Thanks for your review, all log added.

@shibd
Copy link
Member Author

shibd commented May 15, 2022

/pulsarbot run-failure-checks

1 similar comment
@shibd
Copy link
Member Author

shibd commented May 15, 2022

/pulsarbot run-failure-checks

@shibd
Copy link
Member Author

shibd commented May 16, 2022

/pulsarbot run-failure-checks

@Technoboy- Technoboy- added the type/enhancement The enhancements for the existing features or docs. e.g. reduce memory usage of the delayed messages label May 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/admin doc-not-needed Your PR changes do not impact docs type/enhancement The enhancements for the existing features or docs. e.g. reduce memory usage of the delayed messages
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants