We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I found a bug, not just asking a question, which should be created in GitHub Discussions.
I have searched the GitHub Issues and GitHub Discussions of this repository and believe that this is not a duplicate.
I have confirmed that this bug belongs to the current repository, not other repositories of RocketMQ.
Windows 10
RocketMQ 5.2.0
No response
inconsistent field modifier order. According to 8.3.1 - Classes - Field Modifiers of the Java Language Specification
For fields, the said production lists the modifiers in this order: @Annotation public protected private static final transient volatile
@Annotation
public
protected
private
static
final
transient
volatile
inconsistent field modifier order.
standard field modifier order.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
[ISSUE #7932] Rectify the modifier order in namesrv
a32eca0
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Before Creating the Bug Report
I found a bug, not just asking a question, which should be created in GitHub Discussions.
I have searched the GitHub Issues and GitHub Discussions of this repository and believe that this is not a duplicate.
I have confirmed that this bug belongs to the current repository, not other repositories of RocketMQ.
Runtime platform environment
Windows 10
RocketMQ version
RocketMQ 5.2.0
JDK Version
No response
Describe the Bug
inconsistent field modifier order.
According to 8.3.1 - Classes - Field Modifiers of the Java Language Specification
For fields, the said production lists the modifiers in this order:
@Annotation
public
protected
private
static
final
transient
volatile
Steps to Reproduce
inconsistent field modifier order.
What Did You Expect to See?
standard field modifier order.
What Did You See Instead?
inconsistent field modifier order.
Additional Context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: