Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature][Module Name] Reconstruct mongodb connector #3698

Closed
3 tasks done
MonsterChenzhuo opened this issue Dec 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed
3 tasks done

[Feature][Module Name] Reconstruct mongodb connector #3698

MonsterChenzhuo opened this issue Dec 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@MonsterChenzhuo
Copy link
Contributor

MonsterChenzhuo commented Dec 12, 2022

Search before asking

  • I had searched in the feature and found no similar feature requirement.

Description

The current mongodb connector has significant performance issues.
The applicable scenario of mongodb is a large wide table, so his data is generally seen as a large amount, a solution when mysql is unable to store it, which puts forward the requirement for data synchronization to be able to quickly handle large amounts of data, currently we only support single concurrency, and cannot perform data fragmentation, which leads to performance can not be improved
图片

Usage Scenario

Massive mongodb data for efficient data synchronization

Related issues

No response

Are you willing to submit a PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct

@hailin0 hailin0 assigned hailin0 and MonsterChenzhuo and unassigned hailin0 Dec 12, 2022
@MonsterChenzhuo MonsterChenzhuo changed the title [Feature][Module Name] Reconfiguration mongodb connector [Feature][Module Name] Reconstruct mongodb connector Dec 12, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity for 30 days. It will be closed in next 7 days if no further activity occurs.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jan 12, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been closed because it has not received response for too long time. You could reopen it if you encountered similar problems in the future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants