Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-11551][DOC][EXAMPLE] Revert PR #10002 #10200

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

liancheng
Copy link
Contributor

This reverts PR #10002, commit 78209b0.

The original PR wasn't tested on Jenkins before being merged.

…es.md using include_example"

This reverts commit 78209b0.
@liancheng
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm merging this to bring back master build.

@liancheng liancheng changed the title Revert PR #10002 "[SPARK-11551][DOC][EXAMPLE] Replace example code in ml-features.md using include_example" [SPARK-11551][DOC][EXAMPLE] Revert PR #10002 Dec 8, 2015
@asfgit asfgit closed this in da2012a Dec 8, 2015
@liancheng
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merged to master and branch-1.6.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2015
This reverts PR #10002, commit 78209b0.

The original PR wasn't tested on Jenkins before being merged.

Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>

Closes #10200 from liancheng/revert-pr-10002.

(cherry picked from commit da2012a)
Signed-off-by: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
@liancheng liancheng deleted the revert-pr-10002 branch December 8, 2015 11:23
@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47333/
Test FAILed.

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor

mengxr commented Dec 9, 2015

@liancheng Thanks for reverting the PR! I thought this is a doc-only PR and only verified doc build locally, but forgot to check code style.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants