Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-2730][SQL] When retrieving a value from a Map, GetItem evaluates key twice #1637

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

yhuai
Copy link
Contributor

@yhuai yhuai commented Jul 29, 2014

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 29, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 1637. This patch merges cleanly.
View progress: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17364/consoleFull

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 29, 2014

QA results for PR 1637:
- This patch PASSES unit tests.
- This patch merges cleanly
- This patch adds no public classes

For more information see test ouptut:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17364/consoleFull

@asfgit asfgit closed this in e364348 Jul 29, 2014
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2014
…es key twice

JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2730

Author: Yin Huai <huai@cse.ohio-state.edu>

Closes #1637 from yhuai/SPARK-2730 and squashes the following commits:

1a9f24e [Yin Huai] Remove unnecessary key evaluation.

(cherry picked from commit e364348)
Signed-off-by: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
@yhuai yhuai deleted the SPARK-2730 branch July 31, 2014 21:10
xiliu82 pushed a commit to xiliu82/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
…es key twice

JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2730

Author: Yin Huai <huai@cse.ohio-state.edu>

Closes apache#1637 from yhuai/SPARK-2730 and squashes the following commits:

1a9f24e [Yin Huai] Remove unnecessary key evaluation.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants