[SPARK-28221][BUILD] Upgrade janino to 3.0.13

[wangyum]

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Mainly change logs:

Version 3.0.13:

• Support for JDK 9/10 in Full Compiler
• The syntax elements that can have modifiers now all have sets of "is...()" methods that check for each modifier. Some also have methods "getAccess()" and/or "getAnnotations()".
• Implement "type annotations" (JLS8 9.7.4)
• Implemented parsing (but not compilation) of "modular compilation units" (JLS11 7.3).
• Replaced all "assert...Uncookable(..., Pattern messageRegex)" and "assert...Uncookable(..., String messageInfix)" method pairs with a single "assert...Uncookable(..., String messageRegex)" method.
  Minor refactoring: Allowed modifiers are now checked in the Parser, not in Java.*. This saves a lot of THROWS clauses.
• Parse Type inference syntax: Type inference for generic instance creation implemented, test cases added.
• Parse MethodReference, ClassInstanceCreationReference and ArrayCreationReference

Version 3.0.12

• Fixed: Operator "&" not defined on types "java.lang.Long" and "int"
• Major bug in JavaSourceClassLoader: When loading the second and following classes, CUs were compiled again, leading to an inconsistent class hierarchy.
• Fixed: Java 9 added "@OverRide public final CharBuffer CharBuffer.rewind() { ..." -- leads easily to a java.lang.NoSuchMethodError
• Changed all occurences of the words "Java bytecode" to "JVM bytecode" to make clearer that the generated bytecode is for the JVMS and not suitable for, e.g. DALVIK.

http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html

How was this patch tested?

Existing test

[SparkQA]

Test build #107066 has finished for PR 25021 at commit 0f56765.

• This patch passes all tests.
• This patch merges cleanly.
• This patch adds no public classes.

[maropu]

Just a question: skips 3.0.12? It seems the change logs for 3.0.13 are listed in the description.

[wangyum]

Thank you @maropu I added some change logs for 3.0.12.

[kiszk]

Looks good to me

One question. Do you wait for confirming the fix of this issue? @JoshRosen
janino-compiler/janino#90

[dongjoon-hyun]

Yay. +1, LGTM, too. So, we are waiting @JoshRosen 's confirmation about janino-compiler/janino#90, right?

[dongjoon-hyun]

Retest this please.

[dongjoon-hyun]

Gentle ping, @JoshRosen . It would be really great if we can get a confirmation from you.

[SparkQA]

Test build #107290 has finished for PR 25021 at commit 0f56765.

• This patch passes all tests.
• This patch merges cleanly.
• This patch adds no public classes.

[JoshRosen]

I haven't had a chance to confirm the Janino bugfix yet, but I don't think that's a blocker to merging this version bump: AFAIK we're not relying on the patched functionality yet.

[dongjoon-hyun]

I see. Great. Thank you so much, @JoshRosen .
Merged to master.

Also, Thank you, @wangyum , @kiszk , @srowen , @maropu , @HyukjinKwon !