SPARK-1307 [DOCS] Don't use term 'standalone' to refer to a Spark Application

[srowen]

HT to Diana, just proposing an implementation of her suggestion, which I rather agreed with. Is there a second/third for the motion?

Refer to "self-contained" rather than "standalone" apps to avoid confusion with standalone deployment mode. And fix placement of reference to this in MLlib docs.

[AmplabJenkins]

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21697/
Test FAILed.

[andrewor14]

I think this is a good idea. I'll leave this here so others can comment, but this LGTM as it is.

[mengxr]

test this please

[mengxr]

LGTM too. Waiting for Jenkins.

[AmplabJenkins]

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21741/
Test FAILed.

[andrewor14]

We probably don't need to run tests on this one since it modifies only docs.

[mengxr]

I tested locally but It is still safer to see Jenkins happy.

[mengxr]

test this please

[SparkQA]

QA tests have started for PR 2787 at commit b5b82e2.

• This patch merges cleanly.

[SparkQA]

QA tests have finished for PR 2787 at commit b5b82e2.

• This patch passes all tests.
• This patch merges cleanly.
• This patch adds no public classes.

[AmplabJenkins]

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21749/
Test PASSed.

[mengxr]

Merged into master. Thanks!