Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[SPARK-3973] Print call site information for broadcasts #2829

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[SPARK-3973] Print call site information for broadcasts #2829

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

shivaram
Copy link
Contributor

Its hard to debug which broadcast variables refer to what in a big codebase. Printing call site information helps in debugging.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21812/
Test FAILed.

@shivaram
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jenkins, retest this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 16, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 2829 at commit cd6dbdf.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 16, 2014

QA tests have finished for PR 2829 at commit cd6dbdf.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21813/
Test PASSed.

@shivaram
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rxin Can you take a look ?

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM, so I've merged this. Thanks!

@asfgit asfgit closed this in e678b9f Oct 17, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@shivaram @AmplabJenkins @SparkQA @andrewor14 @JoshRosen