Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spark 1384 - Fix spark-shell on yarn access to secure hdfs - branch-0.9 only #287

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tgravescs
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build triggered.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build started.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13639/

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2014
This is to workaround accessing secure hdfs from spark-shell in yarn-client mode.  Note this only applies to branch-0.9 and is intended to be included in the documentation for 0.9.1. The real fix after 0.9.1 is included in #287

Author: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>

Closes #314 from tgravescs/docFix09rc3 and squashes the following commits:

222e848 [Thomas Graves] Update documentation for work around for SPARK-1384
@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor

mengxr commented Jun 10, 2014

LGTM. Thanks!

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2014
….9 only

Author: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>

Closes #287 from tgravescs/SPARK-1384 and squashes the following commits:

ae9162a [Thomas Graves] SPARK-1384 - fix spark-shell on yarn access to secure HDFS
@tgravescs tgravescs closed this Jun 10, 2014
rahij pushed a commit to rahij/spark that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2017
bzhaoopenstack pushed a commit to bzhaoopenstack/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2019
Remove the workaround of glanceclient issue for jobs against public clouds
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants