Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[SQL] Minor fix for doc and comment #3533

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[SQL] Minor fix for doc and comment #3533

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

scwf
Copy link
Contributor

@scwf scwf commented Dec 1, 2014

No description provided.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 1, 2014

Test build #23982 has started for PR 3533 at commit 962910b.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 1, 2014

Test build #23982 has finished for PR 3533 at commit 962910b.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23982/
Test PASSed.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2014
@scwf @marmbrus
[SQL] Minor fix for doc and comment
31cf51b 
Author: wangfei <wangfei1@huawei.com>

Closes #3533 from scwf/sql-doc1 and squashes the following commits:

962910b [wangfei] doc and comment fix

(cherry picked from commit 7b79957)
Signed-off-by: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 7b79957 Dec 1, 2014
@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

marmbrus commented Dec 1, 2014

Thanks! Merged to master and 1.2

@scwf scwf deleted the sql-doc1 branch January 7, 2015 09:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@scwf @SparkQA @AmplabJenkins @marmbrus