Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[branch-1.0][SPARK-4355] ColumnStatisticsAggregator doesn't merge mean correctly #3850

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mengxr
Copy link
Contributor

@mengxr mengxr commented Dec 30, 2014

This backports the bug fix in #3220.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 30, 2014

Test build #24914 has started for PR 3850 at commit ae9b94a.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 31, 2014

Test build #24914 timed out for PR 3850 at commit ae9b94a after a configured wait of 120m.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24914/
Test FAILed.

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor Author

mengxr commented Dec 31, 2014

test this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 31, 2014

Test build #24962 has started for PR 3850 at commit ae9b94a.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 31, 2014

Test build #24962 timed out for PR 3850 at commit ae9b94a after a configured wait of 120m.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24962/
Test FAILed.

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor Author

mengxr commented Dec 31, 2014

@JoshRosen It seems that the unit tests took more than 120 minutes. Could you take a look?

@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

I don't see any obvious culprits in the log, although Jenkins was pretty heavily loaded when that test ran. I suppose you could try testing again? Otherwise, I can help you to log into Jenkins to look at the actual unit-test.log files.

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor Author

mengxr commented Dec 31, 2014

test this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 31, 2014

Test build #24973 has started for PR 3850 at commit ae9b94a.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 31, 2014

Test build #24973 has finished for PR 3850 at commit ae9b94a.

  • This patch fails some tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24973/
Test FAILed.

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor Author

mengxr commented Dec 31, 2014

@JoshRosen It seems that the branch-1.0 build is broken: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/Spark-1.0-Maven-pre-YARN/

@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

Some of those are new flaky failures, while others are longstanding issues that still need to be fixed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5039

@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

Actually, this is timely, since there's now #3864 for that linked JIRA

@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

This looks like a legitimate build break / test failure in branch-1.0, possibly related to SPARK_HOME settings in the sbt build; I'm investigating now; see #3864 for more details.

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor Author

mengxr commented Jan 10, 2015

test this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 10, 2015

Test build #25355 has started for PR 3850 at commit ae9b94a.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 10, 2015

Test build #25355 has finished for PR 3850 at commit ae9b94a.

  • This patch fails some tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25355/
Test FAILed.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 2, 2015

Test build #26529 has started for PR 3850 at commit ae9b94a.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 2, 2015

Test build #26529 has finished for PR 3850 at commit ae9b94a.

  • This patch fails some tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26529/
Test FAILed.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Feb 3, 2015

What do we do with this?

@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

@rxin I think folks have been holding off on merging branch 1.0 backports because the tests usually fail there, although in many cases I think that's because our test stability improvements haven't been backported to that branch, leaving those tests much more prone to spurious failures due to timing issues port contention, etc.

Since the number of branch-1.0 backports is so small, we could just merge them in now as long as they compile and choose to fix up the tests later or run the tests in an environment with less contention (e.g. a dedicated EC2 node rather than AMPLab Jenkins). This isn't an ideal situation, but I think it might be better than just closing these PRs or leaving them to clutter up the review queue.

@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

Jenkins, retest this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 8, 2015

Test build #27034 has started for PR 3850 at commit ae9b94a.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 8, 2015

Test build #27034 has finished for PR 3850 at commit ae9b94a.

  • This patch fails some tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27034/
Test FAILed.

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor Author

mengxr commented Feb 18, 2015

test this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 18, 2015

Test build #27683 has started for PR 3850 at commit ae9b94a.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 18, 2015

Test build #27683 has finished for PR 3850 at commit ae9b94a.

  • This patch fails some tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27683/
Test FAILed.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 21, 2015

Test build #27818 has started for PR 3850 at commit ae9b94a.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 21, 2015

Test build #27818 has finished for PR 3850 at commit ae9b94a.

  • This patch fails some tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27818/
Test FAILed.

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Mar 8, 2015

In order to close this out, is it worth just merging this into 1.0 as @JoshRosen suggests?
Same for some of these other back-ports to 0.9 or 1.0.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2015
…n correctly

This backports the bug fix in #3220.

Author: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>

Closes #3850 from mengxr/SPARK-4355-1.0 and squashes the following commits:

ae9b94a [Xiangrui Meng] ColumnStatisticsAggregator doesn't merge mean correctly
@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor Author

mengxr commented Mar 9, 2015

Okay. Merge into branch-1.0:)

@mengxr mengxr closed this Mar 9, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants