Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-7430][STREAMING][TEST] General improvements to streaming tests to increase debuggability #5961

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

tdas
Copy link
Contributor

@tdas tdas commented May 7, 2015

No description provided.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build triggered.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build started.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented May 7, 2015

Test build #32068 has started for PR 5961 at commit fbf7174.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented May 7, 2015

Test build #32068 has finished for PR 5961 at commit fbf7174.

  • This patch fails Scala style tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
    • class TestOutputStreamWithPartitions[T: ClassTag](

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build finished. Test FAILed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32068/
Test FAILed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build triggered.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build started.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented May 7, 2015

Test build #32070 has started for PR 5961 at commit d654978.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented May 7, 2015

Test build #32070 has finished for PR 5961 at commit d654978.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
    • class TestOutputStream[T: ClassTag](
    • class TestOutputStreamWithPartitions[T: ClassTag](

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32070/
Test PASSed.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 7, 2015
…ts to increase debuggability

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes #5961 from tdas/SPARK-7430 and squashes the following commits:

d654978 [Tathagata Das] Fix scala style
fbf7174 [Tathagata Das] Added more verbose assert failure messages.
6aea07a [Tathagata Das] Ensure SynchronizedBuffer is used in every TestSuiteBase

(cherry picked from commit cfdadcb)
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in cfdadcb May 7, 2015
jeanlyn pushed a commit to jeanlyn/spark that referenced this pull request May 28, 2015
…ts to increase debuggability

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes apache#5961 from tdas/SPARK-7430 and squashes the following commits:

d654978 [Tathagata Das] Fix scala style
fbf7174 [Tathagata Das] Added more verbose assert failure messages.
6aea07a [Tathagata Das] Ensure SynchronizedBuffer is used in every TestSuiteBase
jeanlyn pushed a commit to jeanlyn/spark that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2015
…ts to increase debuggability

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes apache#5961 from tdas/SPARK-7430 and squashes the following commits:

d654978 [Tathagata Das] Fix scala style
fbf7174 [Tathagata Das] Added more verbose assert failure messages.
6aea07a [Tathagata Das] Ensure SynchronizedBuffer is used in every TestSuiteBase
nemccarthy pushed a commit to nemccarthy/spark that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2015
…ts to increase debuggability

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes apache#5961 from tdas/SPARK-7430 and squashes the following commits:

d654978 [Tathagata Das] Fix scala style
fbf7174 [Tathagata Das] Added more verbose assert failure messages.
6aea07a [Tathagata Das] Ensure SynchronizedBuffer is used in every TestSuiteBase
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants