Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-8154][SQL] Remove Term/Code type aliases in code generation. #6694

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

rxin
Copy link
Contributor

@rxin rxin commented Jun 8, 2015

From my perspective as a code reviewer, I find them more confusing than using String directly.

rxin added 2 commits June 7, 2015 18:45
Also moved a few files in expressions package around to match test suites.

Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>

Closes apache#6693 from rxin/expr-refactoring and squashes the following commits:

857599f [Reynold Xin] Fixed style violation.
c0eb74b [Reynold Xin] Fixed compilation.
b3a40f8 [Reynold Xin] Refactored expression test suites.
@davies
Copy link
Contributor

davies commented Jun 8, 2015

LGTM

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jun 8, 2015

Test build #34404 has finished for PR 6694 at commit 4e5056c.

  • This patch fails PySpark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor Author

rxin commented Jun 8, 2015

Jenkins, retest this please.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 72ba0fc Jun 8, 2015
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jun 8, 2015

Test build #890 timed out for PR 6694 at commit 4e5056c after a configured wait of 175m.

nemccarthy pushed a commit to nemccarthy/spark that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2015
From my perspective as a code reviewer, I find them more confusing than using String directly.

Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>

Closes apache#6694 from rxin/SPARK-8154 and squashes the following commits:

4e5056c [Reynold Xin] [SPARK-8154][SQL] Remove Term/Code type aliases in code generation.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants