Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: is_temporal should be overridden by is_dttm value #11429

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 27, 2020

Conversation

villebro
Copy link
Member

@villebro villebro commented Oct 26, 2020

SUMMARY

TableColumn has three properties to check the datatype of a column: is_numeric, is_string and is_temporal. is_temporal is usually referenced when a new dataset is added to populate default values for is_dttm, which indicates whether or not a column is to added to the time column dropdown. While we should usually directly reference is_dttm, the other slightly ambiguously named property can sometimes be used, causing incorrect behaviour.

This PR changes the behaviour of is_temporal to first check the value of is_dttm, and if that is not None (=after initial metadata extraction), return that value, otherwise check the datatype based on the column type. The placeholder text is also fixed, as it featured non-compliant syntax (Year is %Y, not %y).

BEFORE/AFTER SCREENSHOTS OR ANIMATED GIF

TEST PLAN

Added test.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

  • Has associated issue:
  • Changes UI
  • Requires DB Migration.
  • Confirm DB Migration upgrade and downgrade tested.
  • Introduces new feature or API
  • Removes existing feature or API

@villebro villebro force-pushed the villebro/is-temporal branch from bff1a24 to 578f9a6 Compare October 26, 2020 19:04
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 26, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #11429 into master will decrease coverage by 4.64%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #11429      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   66.55%   61.90%   -4.65%     
==========================================
  Files         860      861       +1     
  Lines       40866    40920      +54     
  Branches     3694     3694              
==========================================
- Hits        27198    25332    -1866     
- Misses      13570    15408    +1838     
- Partials       98      180      +82     
Flag Coverage Δ
#cypress ?
#javascript 62.90% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️
#python 61.32% <100.00%> (-0.61%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...erset-frontend/src/datasource/DatasourceEditor.jsx 63.63% <ø> (-7.73%) ⬇️
superset/connectors/sqla/models.py 89.51% <100.00%> (-0.25%) ⬇️
superset-frontend/src/SqlLab/App.jsx 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
superset-frontend/src/explore/App.jsx 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
superset-frontend/src/dashboard/App.jsx 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
superset-frontend/src/explore/index.jsx 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
superset-frontend/src/dashboard/index.jsx 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
superset-frontend/src/setup/setupColors.js 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
superset-frontend/src/chart/ChartContainer.jsx 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
superset-frontend/src/setup/setupFormatters.js 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
... and 193 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ac498dd...578f9a6. Read the comment docs.

@villebro villebro requested a review from dpgaspar October 26, 2020 22:17
Copy link
Member

@suddjian suddjian left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

makes sense

@villebro villebro merged commit 8575439 into apache:master Oct 27, 2020
auxten pushed a commit to auxten/incubator-superset that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2020
@mistercrunch mistercrunch added 🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels 🚢 1.0.0 labels Mar 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels size/S 🚢 1.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants