Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Removing parent filter causes incorrect state of child filter #16876

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 29, 2021

Conversation

michael-s-molina
Copy link
Member

@michael-s-molina michael-s-molina commented Sep 28, 2021

SUMMARY

Fixes #16825

It also fixes another issue where the advanced section was being collapsed when a user unchecked all the options.

@junlincc @jinghua-qa It would be great to have your approval.

AFTER SCREENSHOTS OR ANIMATED GIF

Screen.Recording.2021-09-28.at.2.55.39.PM.mov

TESTING INSTRUCTIONS

Check the original issue for instructions.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

  • Has associated issue:
  • Required feature flags:
  • Changes UI
  • Includes DB Migration (follow approval process in SIP-59)
    • Migration is atomic, supports rollback & is backwards-compatible
    • Confirm DB migration upgrade and downgrade tested
    • Runtime estimates and downtime expectations provided
  • Introduces new feature or API
  • Removes existing feature or API

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 28, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #16876 (a2df466) into master (27a40d2) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 67.35%.

❗ Current head a2df466 differs from pull request most recent head de0bc2d. Consider uploading reports for the commit de0bc2d to get more accurate results
Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #16876      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.05%   77.02%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files        1021     1022       +1     
  Lines       54693    54859     +166     
  Branches     7457     7482      +25     
==========================================
+ Hits        42141    42256     +115     
- Misses      12307    12356      +49     
- Partials      245      247       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
javascript 71.13% <42.40%> (-0.06%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...et-frontend/src/dashboard/components/Dashboard.jsx 78.09% <0.00%> (-0.76%) ⬇️
...set-frontend/src/dashboard/containers/Dashboard.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
superset-frontend/src/dataMask/reducer.ts 68.51% <0.00%> (-2.64%) ⬇️
superset-frontend/src/setup/setupColors.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...set-frontend/src/views/CRUD/data/database/types.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
superset/databases/api.py 92.95% <ø> (ø)
...c/views/CRUD/data/database/DatabaseModal/index.tsx 44.05% <4.34%> (-0.09%) ⬇️
.../database/DatabaseModal/DatabaseConnectionForm.tsx 48.71% <5.88%> (-5.21%) ⬇️
superset-frontend/src/dataMask/actions.ts 66.66% <33.33%> (-5.56%) ⬇️
superset/db_engine_specs/bigquery.py 84.71% <37.50%> (-2.13%) ⬇️
... and 18 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 27a40d2...de0bc2d. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@villebro villebro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for fixing this + making the code much more readable 👍

restoreFilter,
form,
parentFilters,
}: FiltersConfigFormProps,
ref: React.RefObject<any>,
) => {
const removed = !!removedFilters[filterId];
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: isRemoved

@geido
Copy link
Member

geido commented Sep 29, 2021

/testenv up FEATURE_DASHBOARD_NATIVE_FILTERS=true FEATURE_DASHBOARD_CROSS_FILTERS=true FEATURE_DASHBOARD_NATIVE_FILTERS_SET=true FEATURE_DASHBOARD_FILTERS_EXPERIMENTAL=true

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@geido Ephemeral environment spinning up at http://52.13.99.32:8080. Credentials are admin/admin. Please allow several minutes for bootstrapping and startup.

@geido
Copy link
Member

geido commented Sep 29, 2021

Hi @michael-s-molina. I found a problem with deleting and undoing a deletion on the fly without saving. As you can see in the video the child filter won't show as hierarchical after the parent filter has been removed and then added back again.

Video.Game.Sales.1.mp4

@michael-s-molina
Copy link
Member Author

michael-s-molina commented Sep 29, 2021

Hi @michael-s-molina. I found a problem with deleting and undoing a deletion on the fly without saving. As you can see in the video the child filter won't show as hierarchical after the parent filter has been removed and then added back again.

Video.Game.Sales.1.mp4

@geido I noticed that in my tests. It's related to the form preserve={false}. I didn't change it because it's a minor problem and I know that you're investigating the preserve={false} in the undo PR follow-up so I preferred to wait for your conclusions. If in the end, if you remove the preserve={false}, this bug will be fixed. If not, I can fix it in a follow-up using a different strategy.

@geido
Copy link
Member

geido commented Sep 29, 2021

Hi @michael-s-molina. I found a problem with deleting and undoing a deletion on the fly without saving. As you can see in the video the child filter won't show as hierarchical after the parent filter has been removed and then added back again.
Video.Game.Sales.1.mp4

@geido I noticed that in my tests. It's related to the form preserve={false}. I didn't change it because it's a minor problem and I know that you're investigating the preserve={false} in the undo PR follow-up so I preferred to wait for your conclusions. If in the end, if you remove the preserve={false}, this bug will be fixed. If not, I can fix it in a follow-up using a different strategy.

I was able to reproduce the correct behavior on master. It appears that the hierarchical setting is properly restored when undoing. One difference that I see is that you have to re-open the "Advanced" section in master currently. Not sure if that is related.

Video.Game.Sales.3.mp4

@michael-s-molina
Copy link
Member Author

@geido I changed the strategy to present "(deleted)" when a parent is removed. This works for saved and non-saved filters.

Screen.Recording.2021-09-29.at.11.30.13.AM.mov

Copy link
Member

@geido geido left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks for the fix!

@michael-s-molina michael-s-molina merged commit 4da4fe4 into apache:master Sep 29, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Ephemeral environment shutdown and build artifacts deleted.

opus-42 pushed a commit to opus-42/incubator-superset that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2021
…pache#16876)

* fix: Removing parent filter causes incorrect state of child filter

* removed to isRemoved

* Shows (deleted) when the parent is removed

* Removes unnecessary code
QAlexBall pushed a commit to QAlexBall/superset that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2021
…pache#16876)

* fix: Removing parent filter causes incorrect state of child filter

* removed to isRemoved

* Shows (deleted) when the parent is removed

* Removes unnecessary code
@mistercrunch mistercrunch added 🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels 🚢 1.4.0 labels Mar 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels size/L 🚢 1.4.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[native filter] Remove parent filter cause incorrect state of child filter
4 participants