Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: Native filter dynamic numeric search #24418

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2023
Merged

fix: Native filter dynamic numeric search #24418

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 5 additions & 3 deletions superset-frontend/src/filters/components/Select/buildQuery.test.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ describe('Select buildQuery', () => {
expect(query.orderby).toEqual([['my_col', false]]);
});

it('should add text search parameter to query filter', () => {
it('should add text search parameter for string to query filter', () => {
const queryContext = buildQuery(formData, {
ownState: {
search: 'abc',
Expand All @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ describe('Select buildQuery', () => {
]);
});

it('should add numeric search parameter to query filter', () => {
it('should add text search parameter for numeric to query filter', () => {
const queryContext = buildQuery(formData, {
ownState: {
search: '123',
Expand All @@ -120,6 +120,8 @@ describe('Select buildQuery', () => {
});
expect(queryContext.queries.length).toEqual(1);
const [query] = queryContext.queries;
expect(query.filters).toEqual([{ col: 'my_col', op: '>=', val: 123 }]);
expect(query.filters).toEqual([
{ col: 'my_col', op: 'ILIKE', val: '%123%' },
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

btw i think LIKE can be enough for since it matches only numbers, right?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nvm. I don't find any performance benefit of using LIKE over ILIKE.

I'm good with it

]);
});
});
16 changes: 5 additions & 11 deletions superset-frontend/src/filters/components/Select/buildQuery.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -39,22 +39,16 @@ const buildQuery: BuildQuery<PluginFilterSelectQueryFormData> = (
if (search) {
columns.filter(isPhysicalColumn).forEach(column => {
const label = getColumnLabel(column);
if (coltypeMap[label] === GenericDataType.STRING) {
if (
coltypeMap[label] === GenericDataType.STRING ||
(coltypeMap[label] === GenericDataType.NUMERIC &&
!Number.isNaN(Number(search)))
) {
extraFilters.push({
col: column,
op: 'ILIKE',
val: `%${search}%`,
});
} else if (
coltypeMap[label] === GenericDataType.NUMERIC &&
!Number.isNaN(Number(search))
) {
// for numeric columns we apply a >= where clause
extraFilters.push({
col: column,
op: '>=',
val: Number(search),
});
}
});
}
Expand Down
9 changes: 8 additions & 1 deletion superset/connectors/base/models.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -433,7 +433,14 @@ def handle_single_value(value: FilterValue | None) -> FilterValue | None:
if isinstance(value, str):
value = value.strip("\t\n")

if target_generic_type == utils.GenericDataType.NUMERIC:
if (
target_generic_type == utils.GenericDataType.NUMERIC
and operator
not in {
utils.FilterOperator.ILIKE,
utils.FilterOperator.LIKE,
}
):
# For backwards compatibility and edge cases
# where a column data type might have changed
return utils.cast_to_num(value)
Expand Down
30 changes: 20 additions & 10 deletions superset/models/helpers.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1173,7 +1173,14 @@ def handle_single_value(value: Optional[FilterValue]) -> Optional[FilterValue]:
if isinstance(value, str):
value = value.strip("\t\n")

if target_generic_type == utils.GenericDataType.NUMERIC:
if (
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm going to turn a blind eye to the fact that this function is copy-and-pasted in multiple places. Furthermore it's rather scary there's zero unit tests for the filter_values_handler method.

target_generic_type == utils.GenericDataType.NUMERIC
and operator
not in {
utils.FilterOperator.ILIKE,
utils.FilterOperator.LIKE,
}
):
# For backwards compatibility and edge cases
# where a column data type might have changed
return utils.cast_to_num(value)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1744,10 +1751,7 @@ def get_sqla_query( # pylint: disable=too-many-arguments,too-many-locals,too-ma
tbl_column=col_obj, template_processor=template_processor
)
col_type = col_obj.type if col_obj else None
col_spec = db_engine_spec.get_column_spec(
native_type=col_type,
# db_extra=self.database.get_extra(),
)
col_spec = db_engine_spec.get_column_spec(native_type=col_type)
is_list_target = op in (
utils.FilterOperator.IN.value,
utils.FilterOperator.NOT_IN.value,
Expand All @@ -1766,7 +1770,6 @@ def get_sqla_query( # pylint: disable=too-many-arguments,too-many-locals,too-ma
target_native_type=col_type,
is_list_target=is_list_target,
db_engine_spec=db_engine_spec,
# db_extra=self.database.get_extra(),
)
if (
col_advanced_data_type != ""
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1848,10 +1851,17 @@ def get_sqla_query( # pylint: disable=too-many-arguments,too-many-locals,too-ma
where_clause_and.append(sqla_col >= eq)
elif op == utils.FilterOperator.LESS_THAN_OR_EQUALS.value:
where_clause_and.append(sqla_col <= eq)
elif op == utils.FilterOperator.LIKE.value:
where_clause_and.append(sqla_col.like(eq))
elif op == utils.FilterOperator.ILIKE.value:
where_clause_and.append(sqla_col.ilike(eq))
elif op in {
utils.FilterOperator.ILIKE,
utils.FilterOperator.LIKE,
}:
if target_generic_type != GenericDataType.STRING:
sqla_col = sa.cast(sqla_col, sa.String)

if utils.FilterOperator.LIKE.value:
where_clause_and.append(sqla_col.like(eq))
else:
where_clause_and.append(sqla_col.ilike(eq))
elif (
op == utils.FilterOperator.TEMPORAL_RANGE.value
and isinstance(eq, str)
Expand Down