Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[deck_multi] fixing issues with deck_multi #4754

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 4, 2018

Conversation

mistercrunch
Copy link
Member

  • bumped deck.gl related libs
  • add missing header to the multi-chart selector control
  • filtering out other deck_multi charts from the chart selector control
  • fix bug around removing charts from control would not remove them from the visualization

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 4, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #4754 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 33.33%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4754      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.38%   72.38%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files         205      205              
  Lines       15374    15396      +22     
  Branches     1182     1182              
==========================================
+ Hits        11128    11145      +17     
- Misses       4243     4248       +5     
  Partials        3        3
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...set/assets/javascripts/explore/stores/controls.jsx 39.25% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
...explore/components/controls/SelectAsyncControl.jsx 63.15% <33.33%> (-1.55%) ⬇️
superset/dataframe.py 97.7% <0%> (-1.05%) ⬇️
superset/viz.py 79.58% <0%> (-0.04%) ⬇️
superset/utils.py 88.07% <0%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7a497e2...604e2f8. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@betodealmeida betodealmeida left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

if (!slice.subSlicesLayers) {
slice.subSlicesLayers = {}; // eslint-disable-line no-param-reassign
}
const subSlicesLayers = {}; // eslint-disable-line no-param-reassign
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can remove the eslint comment here, no?

const layer = layerGenerators[subsliceCopy.form_data.viz_type](subsliceCopy.form_data, data);
slice.subSlicesLayers[subsliceCopy.slice_id] = layer; // eslint-disable-line no-param-reassign
subSlicesLayers[subsliceCopy.slice_id] = layer; // eslint-disable-line no-param-reassign
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here, eslint comment should not be necessary.

@mistercrunch mistercrunch merged commit 68999b1 into apache:master Apr 4, 2018
@mistercrunch mistercrunch deleted the fix_multi_deck branch April 4, 2018 23:52
hughhhh pushed a commit to lyft/incubator-superset that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2018
michellethomas pushed a commit to michellethomas/panoramix that referenced this pull request May 24, 2018
* [deck_multi] fixing issues with deck_multi

* removing eslint comment
timifasubaa pushed a commit to timifasubaa/incubator-superset that referenced this pull request May 31, 2018
* [deck_multi] fixing issues with deck_multi

* removing eslint comment
wenchma pushed a commit to wenchma/incubator-superset that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2018
* [deck_multi] fixing issues with deck_multi

* removing eslint comment
@mistercrunch mistercrunch added 🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels 🚢 0.25.0 labels Feb 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels 🚢 0.25.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants