Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[slice] Fix, remove duplicate label_columns property #7113

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 17, 2019

Conversation

dpgaspar
Copy link
Member

Small fix, to remove duplicate label_columns property on core.SliceModelView

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 25, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #7113 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7113      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   64.59%   64.59%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         422      422              
  Lines       20587    20586       -1     
  Branches     2251     2251              
==========================================
- Hits        13298    13297       -1     
  Misses       7167     7167              
  Partials      122      122
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
superset/views/core.py 74.91% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b3c4bd9...dd94ec1. Read the comment docs.

@mistercrunch mistercrunch merged commit 1ffd3b1 into apache:master Apr 17, 2019
@mistercrunch mistercrunch added 🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels 🚢 0.34.0 labels Feb 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels 🚢 0.34.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants