Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[LLVM] Add support for DeclBufferNode #14103

Merged

Conversation

quic-sanirudh
Copy link
Contributor

DeclBufferNode was added recently in #12300, but support to traverse it in codegen_llvm was not added. Since this stmt just declares a new buffer for a body of TIR, we just need to traverse the body to properly generate code for LLVM.

`DeclBufferNode` was added recently in apache#12300, but support to traverse it in codegen_llvm was not added. Since this just stmt just declares a new buffer for a body of TIR, we just need to traverse the body to properly generate code for LLVM.
@tvm-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

tvm-bot commented Feb 23, 2023

Thanks for contributing to TVM! Please refer to the contributing guidelines https://tvm.apache.org/docs/contribute/ for useful information and tips. Please request code reviews from Reviewers by @-ing them in a comment.

  • No users to tag found in teams: llvm See #10317 for details

Generated by tvm-bot

@quic-sanirudh
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @kparzysz-quic @vinx13

@kparzysz-quic kparzysz-quic merged commit 125bbb2 into apache:main Feb 23, 2023
@quic-sanirudh quic-sanirudh deleted the codegen_llvm_decl_buffer_support branch February 24, 2023 02:07
yongwww pushed a commit to yongwww/tvm that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2023
`DeclBufferNode` was added recently in apache#12300, but support to traverse it in codegen_llvm was not added. Since this just stmt just declares a new buffer for a body of TIR, we just need to traverse the body to properly generate code for LLVM.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants