Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[TensorIR][M2a] Fuse, Split #8467
[TensorIR][M2a] Fuse, Split #8467
Changes from 15 commits
375c8b1
36527c1
0bd76fb
9673c00
8b4bee8
ce0bd7a
cf9a729
a097b88
76e7443
87c98e2
ac7afc7
5d45b90
c6167ca
09c6a41
c603478
5e442f9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please send this as separate PR with regression testcases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These lines are added to support symbolic split/fuse in some simple cases, but it still can't handle situations where there are 2 or more symbolic vars. Do you think we should support this simple situation for now by merging it in a new PR or we put it aside and support the complete symbolic usage after we improve symbolic divisible check in iter_affine_map?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tqchen @junrushao1994 what's your opinion on this?