Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unify in-scope name types #2635

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 6, 2023
Merged

Unify in-scope name types #2635

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 6, 2023

Conversation

thpani
Copy link
Collaborator

@thpani thpani commented Jul 6, 2023

Enable construction of names with a more concrete type than the one in scope.

Enable construction of names with a more concrete type than the one in
scope.
@thpani thpani self-assigned this Jul 6, 2023
@thpani thpani requested a review from Kukovec as a code owner July 6, 2023 12:28
@thpani thpani enabled auto-merge July 6, 2023 12:35
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 6, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2635 (afa6555) into main (5d09cd5) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2635      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.52%   78.51%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         451      451              
  Lines       15705    15707       +2     
  Branches     2572     2522      -50     
==========================================
  Hits        12332    12332              
- Misses       3373     3375       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...la/typecomp/subbuilder/LiteralAndNameBuilder.scala 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@thpani thpani merged commit f6bfe31 into main Jul 6, 2023
10 checks passed
@thpani thpani deleted the th/builder-name-unify branch July 6, 2023 14:18
@thpani thpani mentioned this pull request Jul 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants