Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

304 with etag matching on cache miss #136

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 16, 2020
Merged

304 with etag matching on cache miss #136

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 16, 2020

Conversation

rockspore
Copy link
Contributor

fix #130

Previous PR #131 forgot to address the case where etag matches the hash but cache isn't hit.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 16, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #136 (42ad14d) into master (144fd64) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #136   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.49%   79.49%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines        1892     1892           
=======================================
  Hits         1504     1504           
  Misses        203      203           
  Partials      185      185           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 144fd64...42ad14d. Read the comment docs.

theganyo
theganyo previously approved these changes Dec 16, 2020
@rockspore rockspore merged commit d2497d8 into master Dec 16, 2020
@rockspore rockspore deleted the issue-131-fix branch December 16, 2020 21:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update /products endpoint to implement etag semantics
2 participants