feature: A user-friendly user management page for apollo portal

[zcy1010]

What's the purpose of this PR

A user-friendly user management page for apollo portal

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #4294

Brief changelog

• Modify the backend, add and modify users, and search the contents of the user interface
• Modified the front-end management user interface

Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

• Read the Contributing Guide before making this pull request.
• Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
• Write necessary unit tests to verify the code.
• Run mvn clean test to make sure this pull request doesn't break anything.
• Update the CHANGES log.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #4464 (1bab738) into master (63c16c1) will decrease coverage by 0.11%.
The diff coverage is 1.69%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #4464      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     53.63%   53.52%   -0.12%     
+ Complexity     2702     2701       -1     
============================================
  Files           489      489              
  Lines         15294    15325      +31     
  Branches       1588     1596       +8     
============================================
- Hits           8203     8202       -1     
- Misses         6535     6565      +30     
- Partials        556      558       +2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ip/framework/apollo/portal/entity/bo/UserInfo.java	52.17% <0.00%> (-7.83%)	⬇️
...trip/framework/apollo/portal/entity/po/UserPO.java	28.00% <0.00%> (-1.17%)	⬇️
...llo/portal/spi/defaultimpl/DefaultUserService.java	69.23% <ø> (ø)
...mework/apollo/portal/spi/ldap/LdapUserService.java	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...ollo/portal/spi/oidc/OidcLocalUserServiceImpl.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
.../spi/springsecurity/SpringSecurityUserService.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...k/apollo/portal/controller/UserInfoController.java	42.30% <12.50%> (-12.70%)	⬇️
...ervice/service/ReleaseMessageServiceWithCache.java	84.70% <0.00%> (-1.18%)	⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us.

[zcy1010]

@nobodyiam please help me review the code.

[nobodyiam]

There are also several issues that need to be fixed.

1. When the user is created/updated, the user list needs to be updated to reflect the changes.
   Now the administrator needs to refresh the page manually to see the newly added user or the updated user info.

2. It's better to allow the administrator enable/disable the users without filling the passwords
   How about we add enable/disable buttons in the operation column?
   

[zcy1010]

2. to allow the administrator enable/disable the users without filling the passwords
How about we add enable/disable buttons in the operation

If the enable or disable is put outside and becomes a separate button, the backend needs to write a new interface,like

@PreAuthorize(value = "@permissionValidator.isSuperAdmin()")
@PostMapping("/user/enabled")
  public void changeUserEnabled(@RequestBody UserPO user) {
  }

Because the current interface checks that the password cannot be empty.

@PreAuthorize(value = "@permissionValidator.isSuperAdmin()")
@PostMapping("/users")
public void createOrUpdateUser(@RequestBody UserPO user) {
  if (StringUtils.isContainEmpty(user.getUsername(), user.getPassword())) {
    throw new BadRequestException("Username and password can not be empty.");
  }

  CheckResult pwdCheckRes = passwordChecker.checkWeakPassword(user.getPassword());
  if (!pwdCheckRes.isSuccess()) {
    throw new BadRequestException(pwdCheckRes.getMessage());
  }

  if (userService instanceof SpringSecurityUserService) {
    ((SpringSecurityUserService) userService).createOrUpdate(user);
  } else {
    throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Create or update user operation is unsupported");
  }
}

is it ok to add a new interface？

[nobodyiam]

BTW, I think it's ok to add a new interface to enable/disable users.

[nobodyiam]

Basically, it looks very good now! Please find some comments below.
BTW, please also update the CHANGES.md.

[zcy1010]

@nobodyiam do you have any other suggestions :D

[nobodyiam]

@zcy1010

It looks great now! There is one minor issue though. I think we need to disable the user login name field in the edit user page:

BTW, please also fix the conflict in CHANGES.md.

[nobodyiam]

LGTM